The Evolution of Business Ethics in China and the United States: Convergence, Divergence, or Crossvergence?

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Management and Organization Review Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1017/mor.2021.68
Jong Min Lee, Yongsun Paik, C. Vance, Donghong Li, Kevin S. Groves
{"title":"The Evolution of Business Ethics in China and the United States: Convergence, Divergence, or Crossvergence?","authors":"Jong Min Lee, Yongsun Paik, C. Vance, Donghong Li, Kevin S. Groves","doi":"10.1017/mor.2021.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study presents a cross-temporal comparison of managerial ethics in China and the US. Although it is well established that cross-cultural differences exist in business ethics and that culture and values in a society may evolve over time, little attention has been paid to the longitudinal changes in such cross-cultural differences that might have occurred over time. Building on three different perspectives on values evolution, namely, convergence, divergence, and crossvergence, we investigate whether and how cross-cultural differences in managerial ethical decision-making and the associated moral philosophy have changed in China and the US over the decade between the mid-1990s and the mid-2000s. Our analysis reveals that the difference in Chinese and American managers' ethical decision-making evolved in many different directions over the decade, lending support to the crossvergence perspective. Interestingly, however, we discover that the divergence outlook prevails when it comes to the moral philosophies behind their decision-making. These findings provide critical insights into cross-cultural as well cross-temporal evolution in business ethics in a world of increasing cross-cultural and multicultural interactions. 摘要 本文对中美两国经理人员的商业伦理决策进行了跨期比较研究。已有研究普遍认为,商业伦理中存在着跨文化差异,且一个社会的文化和价值观会随着时间的推移而演化。但是,相关研究对这种跨文化差异随着时间的推移而发生纵向变化的关注相对较少。基于价值观演化的三种不同视角——趋同、趋异和交叉融合,我们研究了在20世纪90年代中期至21世纪最初十年的中期这一阶段,中美两国经理人员的商业伦理决策和相关道德哲学的跨文化差异的纵向变化。我们的分析表明,在这十年中,中美两国经理人员的商业伦理决策差异在多个不同方向上演化,存在着交叉融合。然而,有趣的是,我们也发现,当涉及到商业伦理决策背后深层次的道德哲学时,相互间的差异点占了上风。这些发现为在全球日益增多的跨文化和多元文化互动中深度认识商业伦理的跨文化和跨时间演化提供了重要见解。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"658 - 685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.68","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents a cross-temporal comparison of managerial ethics in China and the US. Although it is well established that cross-cultural differences exist in business ethics and that culture and values in a society may evolve over time, little attention has been paid to the longitudinal changes in such cross-cultural differences that might have occurred over time. Building on three different perspectives on values evolution, namely, convergence, divergence, and crossvergence, we investigate whether and how cross-cultural differences in managerial ethical decision-making and the associated moral philosophy have changed in China and the US over the decade between the mid-1990s and the mid-2000s. Our analysis reveals that the difference in Chinese and American managers' ethical decision-making evolved in many different directions over the decade, lending support to the crossvergence perspective. Interestingly, however, we discover that the divergence outlook prevails when it comes to the moral philosophies behind their decision-making. These findings provide critical insights into cross-cultural as well cross-temporal evolution in business ethics in a world of increasing cross-cultural and multicultural interactions. 摘要 本文对中美两国经理人员的商业伦理决策进行了跨期比较研究。已有研究普遍认为,商业伦理中存在着跨文化差异,且一个社会的文化和价值观会随着时间的推移而演化。但是,相关研究对这种跨文化差异随着时间的推移而发生纵向变化的关注相对较少。基于价值观演化的三种不同视角——趋同、趋异和交叉融合,我们研究了在20世纪90年代中期至21世纪最初十年的中期这一阶段,中美两国经理人员的商业伦理决策和相关道德哲学的跨文化差异的纵向变化。我们的分析表明,在这十年中,中美两国经理人员的商业伦理决策差异在多个不同方向上演化,存在着交叉融合。然而,有趣的是,我们也发现,当涉及到商业伦理决策背后深层次的道德哲学时,相互间的差异点占了上风。这些发现为在全球日益增多的跨文化和多元文化互动中深度认识商业伦理的跨文化和跨时间演化提供了重要见解。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美商业伦理的演变:趋同、分化还是交叉?
摘要:本研究对中美两国的管理伦理进行了跨时间比较。虽然众所周知,商业道德中存在跨文化差异,社会中的文化和价值观可能随着时间的推移而演变,但很少有人注意到这种跨文化差异可能随着时间的推移而发生的纵向变化。基于价值观演化的三种不同视角,即趋同、分化和交叉,我们研究了20世纪90年代中期至21世纪头十年中期,中美管理伦理决策和相关道德哲学的跨文化差异是否发生了变化,以及如何发生变化。我们的分析表明,在过去十年中,中美管理者道德决策的差异在许多不同的方向上演变,为交叉趋同观点提供了支持。然而,有趣的是,我们发现,当涉及到他们决策背后的道德哲学时,分歧的观点占了上风。这些发现为跨文化和多元文化互动日益增加的世界中商业道德的跨文化和跨时间演变提供了重要的见解。摘要 本文对中美两国经理人员的商业伦理决策进行了跨期比较研究。已有研究普遍认为,商业伦理中存在着跨文化差异,且一个社会的文化和价值观会随着时间的推移而演化。但是,相关研究对这种跨文化差异随着时间的推移而发生纵向变化的关注相对较少。基于价值观演化的三种不同视角——趋同、趋异和交叉融合,我们研究了在20世纪90年代中期至21世纪最初十年的中期这一阶段,中美两国经理人员的商业伦理决策和相关道德哲学的跨文化差异的纵向变化。我们的分析表明,在这十年中,中美两国经理人员的商业伦理决策差异在多个不同方向上演化,存在着交叉融合。然而,有趣的是,我们也发现,当涉及到商业伦理决策背后深层次的道德哲学时,相互间的差异点占了上风。这些发现为在全球日益增多的跨文化和多元文化互动中深度认识商业伦理的跨文化和跨时间演化提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Responsible Research: Reflections of Two Business Scholars Doing Mental Health Research During COVID-19 Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency Corporate Social Irresponsibility in Business: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Agenda Working with a Mask: How and When Workplace Mask Wearing Decreases Employee Emotional Exhaustion Commentary on Perspective Article: ‘Institutional Logics: Motivating Action and Overcoming Resistance to Change’ – Heather A. Haveman, David Joseph-Goteiner, and Danyang Li
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1