S. Rudraswamy, Jai Shankar Hombarvali, M. Kenganora, N. Doggalli, B. Godhi, Sowmya Srinivas
{"title":"Antimicrobial Activity of Simarouba glauca Leaf Extracts Against Oral Pathogens − An In Vitro Study","authors":"S. Rudraswamy, Jai Shankar Hombarvali, M. Kenganora, N. Doggalli, B. Godhi, Sowmya Srinivas","doi":"10.4103/jofs.jofs_147_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Oral diseases caused by biofilm continue to be a public health concern worldwide. The interesting task is to “battle” against oral biofilms, chiefly due to their propensity to persist even after mechanical removal. Mechanical oral hygiene measures, along with professional maintenance and usage of fluorides, are conservative practices to prevent oral biofilm. Adjunct to mechanical plaque control method, antimicrobial mouth wash is suggested. Although chlorhexidine is a gold standard antiplaque agent, its potential drawbacks on long-term use necessitates the development of a novel, alternate strategy that can inhibit oral biofilm. Materials and Methods: Simarouba glauca (SG) leaf extracts were prepared by maceration and Soxhlet methods. Zone of inhibition (ZOI) and Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were conducted against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacilli acidophilus, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Prophyromonas gingivalis to determine the antimicrobial activity of leaf extracts of SG using agar well diffusion and broth dilution method. Results: ZOI was exhibited by ethanol extract (ESG) on S. mutans (25 ± 0.03 mm) and L. acidophilus (23 ± 0.07 mm) at 1 mg/mL while ZOI was exhibited by aqueous extract (ASG) on E. coli (14 ± 0.00 mm) and S. aureus (15 ± 0.01 mm) at 1.5 mg/mL. Both ESG and ASG did not show activity on P. gingivalis. MIC was obtained at 0.625 mg/mL for S. mutans, 0.312 mg/mL for L. acidophilus, 1.25 mg/mL for S. aureus, 0.625 mg/mL for E. coli, and P. gingivalis did not show inhibitory effect. Conclusion: The in vitro studies on antimicrobial activity showed antimicrobial activity of SG plant extract on oral microorganisms. This could be because of secondary metabolites like flavonoids, phenolics, etc.","PeriodicalId":16651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":"8 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_147_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Oral diseases caused by biofilm continue to be a public health concern worldwide. The interesting task is to “battle” against oral biofilms, chiefly due to their propensity to persist even after mechanical removal. Mechanical oral hygiene measures, along with professional maintenance and usage of fluorides, are conservative practices to prevent oral biofilm. Adjunct to mechanical plaque control method, antimicrobial mouth wash is suggested. Although chlorhexidine is a gold standard antiplaque agent, its potential drawbacks on long-term use necessitates the development of a novel, alternate strategy that can inhibit oral biofilm. Materials and Methods: Simarouba glauca (SG) leaf extracts were prepared by maceration and Soxhlet methods. Zone of inhibition (ZOI) and Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were conducted against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacilli acidophilus, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Prophyromonas gingivalis to determine the antimicrobial activity of leaf extracts of SG using agar well diffusion and broth dilution method. Results: ZOI was exhibited by ethanol extract (ESG) on S. mutans (25 ± 0.03 mm) and L. acidophilus (23 ± 0.07 mm) at 1 mg/mL while ZOI was exhibited by aqueous extract (ASG) on E. coli (14 ± 0.00 mm) and S. aureus (15 ± 0.01 mm) at 1.5 mg/mL. Both ESG and ASG did not show activity on P. gingivalis. MIC was obtained at 0.625 mg/mL for S. mutans, 0.312 mg/mL for L. acidophilus, 1.25 mg/mL for S. aureus, 0.625 mg/mL for E. coli, and P. gingivalis did not show inhibitory effect. Conclusion: The in vitro studies on antimicrobial activity showed antimicrobial activity of SG plant extract on oral microorganisms. This could be because of secondary metabolites like flavonoids, phenolics, etc.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orofacial Sciences is dedicated to noblest profession of Dentistry, and to the young & blossoming intellects of dentistry, with whom the future of dentistry will be cherished better. The prime aim of this journal is to advance the science and art of dentistry. This journal is an educational tool to encourage and share the acquired knowledge with our peers. It also to improves the standards and quality of therauptic methods. This journal assures you to gain knowledge in recent advances and research activities. The journal publishes original scientific papers with special emphasis on research, unusual case reports, editorial, review articles, book reviews & other relevant information in context of high professional standards.