THE ‘BRUSSELS BUBBLE’: POPULISM IN SLOVENIA IN THE EU CRISES CONTEXT

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY TEORIJA IN PRAKSA Pub Date : 2022-07-14 DOI:10.51936/tip.59.2.509-528
Marko Lovec, Faris Kočan, Melika Mahmutović
{"title":"THE ‘BRUSSELS BUBBLE’: POPULISM IN SLOVENIA\nIN THE EU CRISES CONTEXT","authors":"Marko Lovec, Faris Kočan, Melika Mahmutović","doi":"10.51936/tip.59.2.509-528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this article is on the rise of populism and Euroscepticism in the context of the crisis of\nliberal internationalism and of the EU in particular.\nThe article considers the view that the weak integration\nof Slovenian–EU politics makes the country vulnerable\nto this trend. Modern-nationalist, postmodern-cosmopolitan and faux-modern-partially modernised variations of populism are explored. The research draws on\npublic opinion surveys, party manifestos, focus groups\nwith party supporters, and interviews with mediators\nin elite and popular debates. The dominant modern\neconomist/functionalist view of the EU is shown to have\nfed into different framings in line with the underlying\nthick ideologies. On the right, this has been a retro-modern nationalist reaction to the EU’s overly progressive\npolicy and polity, with certain illiberal faux-modern elements like authoritarianism and ethno cultural exclusivism. On the left, it has reinforced the already existing contradictions with (neo)liberalism on the level of\npolitics, leaving the post-modern post-nationalist framing detached from the EU’s polity and policy. The article\noffers some proposals for better integrating the EU politics in Slovenia.\nKeywords: EU, Euroscepticism, populism, illiberalism,\nSlovenia, public opinion, political parties","PeriodicalId":44389,"journal":{"name":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.59.2.509-528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus of this article is on the rise of populism and Euroscepticism in the context of the crisis of liberal internationalism and of the EU in particular. The article considers the view that the weak integration of Slovenian–EU politics makes the country vulnerable to this trend. Modern-nationalist, postmodern-cosmopolitan and faux-modern-partially modernised variations of populism are explored. The research draws on public opinion surveys, party manifestos, focus groups with party supporters, and interviews with mediators in elite and popular debates. The dominant modern economist/functionalist view of the EU is shown to have fed into different framings in line with the underlying thick ideologies. On the right, this has been a retro-modern nationalist reaction to the EU’s overly progressive policy and polity, with certain illiberal faux-modern elements like authoritarianism and ethno cultural exclusivism. On the left, it has reinforced the already existing contradictions with (neo)liberalism on the level of politics, leaving the post-modern post-nationalist framing detached from the EU’s polity and policy. The article offers some proposals for better integrating the EU politics in Slovenia. Keywords: EU, Euroscepticism, populism, illiberalism, Slovenia, public opinion, political parties
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布鲁塞尔泡沫:欧盟危机背景下斯洛文尼亚的民粹主义
本文的重点是在自由国际主义危机,特别是欧盟危机的背景下民粹主义和欧洲怀疑主义的兴起。文章认为,斯洛文尼亚与欧盟政治的弱融合使该国容易受到这种趋势的影响。探讨了民粹主义的现代民族主义、后现代世界主义和伪现代部分现代化的变体。这项研究利用了民意调查、政党宣言、与政党支持者的焦点小组,以及对精英和民众辩论中调解人的采访。现代经济学家/功能主义者对欧盟的主流观点被证明已经融入了与底层意识形态一致的不同框架中。在右翼,这是对欧盟过于进步的政策和政治的复古现代民族主义反应,带有某些不自由的伪现代元素,如威权主义和种族文化排外主义。在左翼,它在政治层面上强化了与(新)自由主义已经存在的矛盾,使后现代的后民族主义框架脱离了欧盟的政治和政策。文章提出了在斯洛文尼亚更好地整合欧盟政治的建议。关键词:欧盟、欧洲怀疑主义、民粹主义、非自由主义、斯洛文尼亚、舆论、政党
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
EMOTIONAL LABOUR AND EMOTIONAL BURNOUT: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF SERVICE SECTOR EMPLOYEES INTERPELACIJA UČENCEV IN UČENK V NOSILCE ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC: RETORIČNA ANALIZA UČNE PRIPRAVE REGULATION OF THE USE OF FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY –LIMITATIONS AND CHALLENGES FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE THE EFFECT OF GREENWASHING PERCEPTION, GREEN WORD OF MOUTH, AND GREEN MARKETING ON H&M PURCHASE INTENTIONS IN JAKARTA MANAGERSKE NAPOVEDI IN DEJANSKI UČINKI PANDEMIJE COVID-19 NA SLOVENSKA PODJETJA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1