Emerging Disparities in the Placement of Law Enforcement-Based Treatment Referral and Recovery Programs

Q1 Social Sciences Criminal Justice Review Pub Date : 2022-07-27 DOI:10.1177/07340168221117109
Ellen A. Donnelly, Chenesia L. Brown, Allison S McBride, L. Beletsky, T. Anderson
{"title":"Emerging Disparities in the Placement of Law Enforcement-Based Treatment Referral and Recovery Programs","authors":"Ellen A. Donnelly, Chenesia L. Brown, Allison S McBride, L. Beletsky, T. Anderson","doi":"10.1177/07340168221117109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rising rates of opioid use disorder, overdoses, and opioid-related criminal offenses have prompted U.S. law enforcement agencies to adopt alternatives to arrest and formal criminal processing. Police departments frequently implement treatment referral programs and claim an affiliation with the Police Assisted Addiction and Recovery Initiative (PAARI). Although expanding to hundreds of agencies, PAARI efforts may not be equally distributed across communities, raising concerns about access to non-arrest diversion and increasing disparities in the criminal processing of drug-related offenses. This study compares the characteristics and geographic placement of law enforcement agencies with and without PAARI programs in 29 states. Law enforcement agencies situated in communities with lower rates of poverty and smaller Black populations have lower odds of having a PAARI program. Agencies based in counties with more overdose deaths and greater unmet treatment needs have increased odds of deflection programing. This placement of PAARI programs reflects broader inequalities in criminal justice and health. More advantaged, predominantly white communities benefit from diversionary programs while fewer alternatives to formal criminal processing exist for lower-income areas and communities of color. Additional research should explore these growing disparities in the deployment of law enforcement-based treatment referral programs and their consequences on drug law enforcement.","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"359 - 376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168221117109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Rising rates of opioid use disorder, overdoses, and opioid-related criminal offenses have prompted U.S. law enforcement agencies to adopt alternatives to arrest and formal criminal processing. Police departments frequently implement treatment referral programs and claim an affiliation with the Police Assisted Addiction and Recovery Initiative (PAARI). Although expanding to hundreds of agencies, PAARI efforts may not be equally distributed across communities, raising concerns about access to non-arrest diversion and increasing disparities in the criminal processing of drug-related offenses. This study compares the characteristics and geographic placement of law enforcement agencies with and without PAARI programs in 29 states. Law enforcement agencies situated in communities with lower rates of poverty and smaller Black populations have lower odds of having a PAARI program. Agencies based in counties with more overdose deaths and greater unmet treatment needs have increased odds of deflection programing. This placement of PAARI programs reflects broader inequalities in criminal justice and health. More advantaged, predominantly white communities benefit from diversionary programs while fewer alternatives to formal criminal processing exist for lower-income areas and communities of color. Additional research should explore these growing disparities in the deployment of law enforcement-based treatment referral programs and their consequences on drug law enforcement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在执法为基础的治疗转诊和康复方案的安置新出现的差距
阿片类药物使用障碍、过量使用和阿片类物质相关刑事犯罪率的上升促使美国执法机构采用逮捕和正式刑事处理的替代方案。警察部门经常实施治疗转介计划,并声称加入了警察协助成瘾和康复倡议(PAARI)。尽管PAARI的工作已扩展到数百个机构,但其在社区中的分布可能并不均匀,这引发了人们对非逮捕转移途径的担忧,并加剧了毒品犯罪刑事处理的差异。这项研究比较了29个州有和没有PAARI项目的执法机构的特点和地理位置。位于贫困率较低、黑人人口较少的社区的执法机构实施PAARI计划的几率较低。设在药物过量死亡人数较多、治疗需求未得到满足的县的机构增加了偏离计划的几率。PAARI项目的这种安排反映了刑事司法和健康方面更广泛的不平等。更有利的、以白人为主的社区从转移注意力的计划中受益,而低收入地区和有色人种社区的正式刑事处理替代方案较少。更多的研究应该探讨基于执法的治疗转诊计划的部署中这些日益增长的差异及其对禁毒执法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Criminal Justice Review
Criminal Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminal Justice Review is a scholarly journal dedicated to presenting a broad perspective on criminal justice issues. It focuses on any aspect of crime and the justice system and can feature local, state, or national concerns. Both qualitative and quantitative pieces are encouraged, providing that they adhere to standards of quality scholarship. As a peer-reviewed journal, we encourage the submission of articles, research notes, commentaries, and comprehensive essays that focus on crime and broadly defined justice-related topics.
期刊最新文献
Sex Offender Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned From Over 70 Years of Research. AMBER Alert: An Ironic Antidote to “Missing White Girl Syndrome”? Public Preferences for Mental Health Initiatives to Prevent Crime Book Review: You might go to prison, even though you’re innocent by Brooks, J. Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: Untangling the Effects of Racial and Ethnic Combinations Between the Police and Civilians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1