Microdynamics of Implementing Planned Change on Organizations’ Front Line

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14697017.2019.1602553
J. Woiceshyn, J. Huq, Kenneth Blades, S. Pendharkar
{"title":"Microdynamics of Implementing Planned Change on Organizations’ Front Line","authors":"J. Woiceshyn, J. Huq, Kenneth Blades, S. Pendharkar","doi":"10.1080/14697017.2019.1602553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Implementing a planned change successfully is critical to organizations’ performance and depends on all members’ participation. Most research has studied leaders’ and middle managers’ role in planning and communicating change, not how frontline staff – those who deal directly with clients and customers, and their direct managers – ultimately implement it. This is surprising, especially in professionalized organizations, as involvement of frontline managers and professional staff is critically important to achieving change. This article reports on a comparative case study that examined how and why some acute care hospital units were more successful in implementing planned change. The data analysis identified change-facilitating and change-inhibiting microdynamics (activities and interactions) among frontline teams: managers and professional nursing staff at the hospital units, which resulted in more and less efficacious implementation of planned change and virtuous and vicious change cycles. The authors developed models that show how and why microdynamics differed in the units and offer guidance to managers in encouraging planned change at organizations’ front line.","PeriodicalId":47003,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","volume":"20 1","pages":"59 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14697017.2019.1602553","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2019.1602553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Implementing a planned change successfully is critical to organizations’ performance and depends on all members’ participation. Most research has studied leaders’ and middle managers’ role in planning and communicating change, not how frontline staff – those who deal directly with clients and customers, and their direct managers – ultimately implement it. This is surprising, especially in professionalized organizations, as involvement of frontline managers and professional staff is critically important to achieving change. This article reports on a comparative case study that examined how and why some acute care hospital units were more successful in implementing planned change. The data analysis identified change-facilitating and change-inhibiting microdynamics (activities and interactions) among frontline teams: managers and professional nursing staff at the hospital units, which resulted in more and less efficacious implementation of planned change and virtuous and vicious change cycles. The authors developed models that show how and why microdynamics differed in the units and offer guidance to managers in encouraging planned change at organizations’ front line.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织前线实施计划变革的微观动力学
成功实施计划变更对组织绩效至关重要,并且取决于所有成员的参与。大多数研究研究的是领导者和中层管理者在规划和沟通变革方面的作用,而不是一线员工——那些直接与客户和顾客打交道的人,以及他们的直接管理者——最终如何实施变革。这是令人惊讶的,特别是在专业化的组织中,因为一线管理人员和专业人员的参与对实现变革至关重要。本文报告了一个比较案例研究,研究了一些急症护理医院单位如何以及为什么更成功地实施计划变更。数据分析确定了一线团队(医院单位的管理人员和专业护理人员)之间促进变革和抑制变革的微动力学(活动和互动),导致计划变革的实施效率或高或低,以及良性和恶性的变革循环。作者开发了一些模型,展示了各单位的微动力学差异是如何以及为什么不同,并为管理者在组织的第一线鼓励有计划的变革提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Journal of Change Management is a multidisciplinary and international forum for critical, mainstream and alternative contributions - focusing as much on psychology, ethics, culture and behaviour as on structure and process. JCM is a platform for open and challenging dialogue and a thorough critique of established as well as alternative practices. JCM is aiming to provide all authors with a first decision within six weeks of submission.
期刊最新文献
Navigating Tensions in the Organizational Change Process towards Hybrid Workspace It’s Not All About the Self: Exploring the Interplay Between Self-leadership and the Social Work Environment ‘Changing the Course of a Super Tanker’: A Study of Senior and Junior Managers’ Enactments of a Transition Narrative What Makes Us See Someone as a Leader? A Field Theory Approach The Fair Share – Multilevel Distributive Justice as Cross-Level Moderator for the Impact of Restructuring Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1