Edmund Burke: natura człowieka i rozum człowieka

Q4 Arts and Humanities Ruch Filozoficzny Pub Date : 2021-02-09 DOI:10.12775/RF.2020.033
P. Hanczewski
{"title":"Edmund Burke: natura człowieka i rozum człowieka","authors":"P. Hanczewski","doi":"10.12775/RF.2020.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a long time, scholars have presented Edmund Burke as an enemy of the Enlightenment, stressing, inter alia , his skepticism towards human reason. This article analyzes Burke’s views concerning the relationship between human nature and human reason as described in his best-known work, Reflections on the Revolution in France . This will not only allow us to consider his opinions in this field but also to better understand his stance towards the Enlightenment.","PeriodicalId":36471,"journal":{"name":"Ruch Filozoficzny","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ruch Filozoficzny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2020.033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For a long time, scholars have presented Edmund Burke as an enemy of the Enlightenment, stressing, inter alia , his skepticism towards human reason. This article analyzes Burke’s views concerning the relationship between human nature and human reason as described in his best-known work, Reflections on the Revolution in France . This will not only allow us to consider his opinions in this field but also to better understand his stance towards the Enlightenment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃德蒙·伯克:人的本性与人的理性
长期以来,学者们将埃德蒙·伯克视为启蒙运动的敌人,特别强调他对人类理性的怀疑。本文分析了伯克在其著名著作《对法国革命的反思》中所阐述的关于人性与人类理性关系的观点。这不仅可以让我们考虑他在这一领域的观点,而且可以更好地理解他对启蒙运动的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ruch Filozoficzny
Ruch Filozoficzny Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cień na oświeceniowym rozumie, czyli Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant i Hugo Kołłątaj o kobietach, ich roli społecznej i edukacji Sprawiedliwość i równość w interpretacji liderów polskiej myśli oświeceniowej Zetetyczny rejs Kwestia wolności w ujęciu Spinozy i Leibniza a perspektywa kompatybilistyczna Anthony Collins i jego pierwsza rozprawa (An Essay Concerning the Use of Reason in Propositions, The Evidence whereof depends upon Human Testimony)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1