Old but Gold: The Surgeon’s Affair to Manage Inguinal Hernia

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY Surgical Techniques Development Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.3390/std12020008
M. Giuffrida, G. Nita, F. Biolchini
{"title":"Old but Gold: The Surgeon’s Affair to Manage Inguinal Hernia","authors":"M. Giuffrida, G. Nita, F. Biolchini","doi":"10.3390/std12020008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure. It was widely reported worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. To manage the lack of anesthesiologists, we have introduced a new protocol to manage inguinal hernia repair. Methods: This protocol is the result of a strong collaboration between surgeons and anesthesiologists. It was based on EHS recommendations and the well-described percutaneous ilioinguinal–iliohypogastric and genitofemoral nerves block. Results: More than 400 patients have been treated at our institution. The application of the protocol has led to a sensible reduction in initially planned spinal anesthesia. The complications traditionally related to spinal anesthesia have not been reported in 80% of the patients. Only three patients required the infusion of atropine or flumazenil without the need to involve anesthesiologist. Conclusion: The application of our protocol seems promising. Preliminary results have shown the safety and efficacy of percutaneous ilioinguinal–iliohypogastric and genitofemoral nerves block. The combination of this kind of anesthesia with wound protector and adequate postoperative pain control can lead to a reproducible system avoiding the not strictly necessary presence of an anesthesiologist. The changes that have occurred in the healthcare system in recent years should be new opportunities for the improvement of resources and results.","PeriodicalId":40379,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Techniques Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Techniques Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/std12020008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure. It was widely reported worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. To manage the lack of anesthesiologists, we have introduced a new protocol to manage inguinal hernia repair. Methods: This protocol is the result of a strong collaboration between surgeons and anesthesiologists. It was based on EHS recommendations and the well-described percutaneous ilioinguinal–iliohypogastric and genitofemoral nerves block. Results: More than 400 patients have been treated at our institution. The application of the protocol has led to a sensible reduction in initially planned spinal anesthesia. The complications traditionally related to spinal anesthesia have not been reported in 80% of the patients. Only three patients required the infusion of atropine or flumazenil without the need to involve anesthesiologist. Conclusion: The application of our protocol seems promising. Preliminary results have shown the safety and efficacy of percutaneous ilioinguinal–iliohypogastric and genitofemoral nerves block. The combination of this kind of anesthesia with wound protector and adequate postoperative pain control can lead to a reproducible system avoiding the not strictly necessary presence of an anesthesiologist. The changes that have occurred in the healthcare system in recent years should be new opportunities for the improvement of resources and results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老而精:外科医生处理腹股沟疝的方法
目的:腹股沟疝修补术是一种常见的外科手术。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,它在世界范围内被广泛报道。为了解决麻醉师短缺的问题,我们引入了一种新的腹股沟疝修补方案。方法:该方案是外科医生和麻醉师之间强有力合作的结果。它是基于EHS建议和描述良好的经皮髂腹股沟-髂下腹和生殖器股神经阻滞。结果:400多名患者在我们的机构接受了治疗。该方案的应用使最初计划的脊柱麻醉明显减少。传统上与脊髓麻醉相关的并发症在80%的患者中没有报道。只有三名患者需要输注阿托品或氟马西尼,而无需麻醉师介入。结论:本方案的应用前景广阔。初步结果显示经皮髂腹股沟-髂下腹和生殖器股神经阻滞的安全性和有效性。这种麻醉与伤口保护器和充分的术后疼痛控制相结合,可以产生一个可重复的系统,避免麻醉师的出现。近年来医疗系统发生的变化应该是改善资源和成果的新机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Increased Postoperative Glycemic Variability Is Associated with Increased Revision Surgery Rates in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Fixation Simultaneous Laparoscopic Surgery for Esophageal Achalasia Combined with Epiphrenic Diverticulum: A Case Report Modified Tension Band Wiring Using Only Non-Absorbable Braided Polyblend Sutures for the Treatment of Patellar Fractures The Method of 3D C-arm Navigated AC Joint Stabilization-Surgical Technique Locoregional vs. General Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis: A Feasibility Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1