German Business Mobilization against Right-Wing Populism

IF 4.1 2区社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Society Pub Date : 2020-08-03 DOI:10.1177/0032329220957153

Daniel Kinderman

{"title":"German Business Mobilization against Right-Wing Populism","authors":"Daniel Kinderman","doi":"10.1177/0032329220957153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do some business associations mobilize, engage in collective action, and take public stands against the populist right while others do not? This article examines business mobilization against the populist right in Germany, which is heavily export-oriented and reliant on the European and global market order. Drawing on interviews with three business associations, the article presents three key findings. First, economic self-interest is a powerful driver of business mobilization: perceived threats and vulnerability spurred two German associations to act collectively against right-wing populism. However, mobilization is driven not by declining revenues or profits but by a mixture of values and material interests. Second, business associations that mobilize stress the need to reform the system, democratize the European Union, and address those who feel “left behind.” Third, medium-size, export-oriented manufacturers are the core business constituency supporting liberal democracy and the European Union. The article shows that some business factions can play a role in defending the liberal international order against right-wing populism.","PeriodicalId":47847,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Society","volume":"49 1","pages":"489 - 516"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0032329220957153","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329220957153","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Abstract

Why do some business associations mobilize, engage in collective action, and take public stands against the populist right while others do not? This article examines business mobilization against the populist right in Germany, which is heavily export-oriented and reliant on the European and global market order. Drawing on interviews with three business associations, the article presents three key findings. First, economic self-interest is a powerful driver of business mobilization: perceived threats and vulnerability spurred two German associations to act collectively against right-wing populism. However, mobilization is driven not by declining revenues or profits but by a mixture of values and material interests. Second, business associations that mobilize stress the need to reform the system, democratize the European Union, and address those who feel “left behind.” Third, medium-size, export-oriented manufacturers are the core business constituency supporting liberal democracy and the European Union. The article shows that some business factions can play a role in defending the liberal international order against right-wing populism.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

反对右翼民粹主义的德国商业动员

为什么一些商业协会动员起来，采取集体行动，公开反对民粹主义右翼，而另一些则没有?本文考察了德国企业动员反对民粹主义右翼的情况。德国严重依赖出口导向，并依赖于欧洲和全球市场秩序。通过对三个商业协会的采访，本文提出了三个主要发现。首先，经济上的自身利益是企业动员的强大推动力:感知到的威胁和脆弱性促使两家德国协会采取集体行动，反对右翼民粹主义。然而，动员不是由收入或利润下降驱动的，而是由价值观和物质利益的混合驱动的。第二，动员起来的商业协会强调有必要改革制度，使欧盟民主化，并解决那些感到“落后”的人的问题。第三，以出口为导向的中型制造商是支持自由民主和欧盟(eu)的核心商业选民。这篇文章表明，一些商业派别可以在捍卫自由主义国际秩序、对抗右翼民粹主义方面发挥作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Politics & Society Multiple-

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

4.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.

期刊最新文献

Bringing Household Finance Back In: House Prices and the Missing Macroeconomics of Comparative Political Economy Who Pays for Environmental Policy? Business Power and the Design of State-Level Climate Policies* Supervising Local Cadres in China: The Quest for Authoritarian Accountability Rethinking Antitrust for the Cloud Era Antitrust and Equal Liberty