{"title":"Optimal oxygen use in neonatal advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation-a literature review.","authors":"Deepika Sankaran, Munmun Rawat, Satyan Lakshminrusimha","doi":"10.21037/pm-21-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) use during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains a subject of controversy. The inspired O<sub>2</sub> concentration during neonatal CPR, that hastens return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), allows adequate cerebral and myocardial O<sub>2</sub> delivery, and enhances survival to discharge, is not known. The optimal FiO<sub>2</sub> during CPR should decrease incidence of hypoxia but also avoid hyperoxia, and ultimately lead to improved neurodevelopmental outcomes. Due to infrequent need for extensive resuscitation, and emergent circumstances surrounding neonatal CPR, conducting randomized clinical trials continues to be a challenge. The goal of this study was to review the evolution of oxygen use during neonatal CPR, the evidence from animal and clinical studies on oxygen use during neonatal CPR and after ROSC, the pertinent physiology including myocardial oxygen consumption and cerebral oxygen delivery during CPR, and outcomes following CPR in the DR and in the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review is based on recent and historic English literature in PubMed and Google scholar over the past 35 years (January 1, 1985 - May 1, 2021).</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Several studies in animal models have compared ventilation with different inspired O<sub>2</sub> concentrations (mostly 21% and 100%) during chest compressions and after ROSC. These studies reported no difference in short-term outcomes, even with as low as 18% O<sub>2</sub>. However, in lamb models of cardiac arrest and CPR, 100% O<sub>2</sub> during chest compressions is associated with better oxygen delivery to the brain compared to 21% O<sub>2</sub>. Abrupt weaning to 21% O<sub>2</sub> following ROSC followed by titration to achieve preductal SpO<sub>2</sub> of 85-95% minimizes systemic hyperoxia and oxidative stress compared to slow weaning from 100% O<sub>2</sub> following ROSC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical research is needed to arrive at the best strategy for assessment of oxygenation and choice of FiO<sub>2</sub> during neonatal CPR that lead to improved survival and outcomes. In this article, we have reviewed the literature on evidence behind O<sub>2</sub> use during neonatal advanced CPR and after ROSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":74411,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/pm-21-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Oxygen (O2) use during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains a subject of controversy. The inspired O2 concentration during neonatal CPR, that hastens return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), allows adequate cerebral and myocardial O2 delivery, and enhances survival to discharge, is not known. The optimal FiO2 during CPR should decrease incidence of hypoxia but also avoid hyperoxia, and ultimately lead to improved neurodevelopmental outcomes. Due to infrequent need for extensive resuscitation, and emergent circumstances surrounding neonatal CPR, conducting randomized clinical trials continues to be a challenge. The goal of this study was to review the evolution of oxygen use during neonatal CPR, the evidence from animal and clinical studies on oxygen use during neonatal CPR and after ROSC, the pertinent physiology including myocardial oxygen consumption and cerebral oxygen delivery during CPR, and outcomes following CPR in the DR and in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Methods: This narrative review is based on recent and historic English literature in PubMed and Google scholar over the past 35 years (January 1, 1985 - May 1, 2021).
Key content and findings: Several studies in animal models have compared ventilation with different inspired O2 concentrations (mostly 21% and 100%) during chest compressions and after ROSC. These studies reported no difference in short-term outcomes, even with as low as 18% O2. However, in lamb models of cardiac arrest and CPR, 100% O2 during chest compressions is associated with better oxygen delivery to the brain compared to 21% O2. Abrupt weaning to 21% O2 following ROSC followed by titration to achieve preductal SpO2 of 85-95% minimizes systemic hyperoxia and oxidative stress compared to slow weaning from 100% O2 following ROSC.
Conclusions: Clinical research is needed to arrive at the best strategy for assessment of oxygenation and choice of FiO2 during neonatal CPR that lead to improved survival and outcomes. In this article, we have reviewed the literature on evidence behind O2 use during neonatal advanced CPR and after ROSC.