Paclitaxel eluting balloon plus spot bare metal stenting for diffuse and very long coronary disease. (PEB-long pilot study)

Ahmed Rezq , Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai , Azeem Latib , Enrico Romagnoli , Alessandro Aprile , Andrea Amato , Maria Grazia Modena , Antonio Colombo , Giuseppe Sangiorgi
{"title":"Paclitaxel eluting balloon plus spot bare metal stenting for diffuse and very long coronary disease. (PEB-long pilot study)","authors":"Ahmed Rezq ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai ,&nbsp;Azeem Latib ,&nbsp;Enrico Romagnoli ,&nbsp;Alessandro Aprile ,&nbsp;Andrea Amato ,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Modena ,&nbsp;Antonio Colombo ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Sangiorgi","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrsc.2017.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Albeit DES might be considered as a breakthrough against neointimal hyperplasia, concerns on stent thrombosis and increase incidence of in-stent restenosis after multiple DES implantations in complex, long lesions still exist. Hereby, we tried to test efficacy and safety of using PEB in long lesions followed by focal BMS implantation in a pilot multicenter study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study enrolled 16 patients with long lesions (&gt;<!--> <!-->30<!--> <!-->mm) that were treated with PEB angioplasty followed by focal stenting with BMS. IVUS was performed before, after PEB and post stenting. Clinical and angiographic follow-up was done at 6<!--> <!-->months. The primary end-point was angiographic late lumen loss.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patient age was 64.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.1<!--> <!-->years, 15 (93.7%) were males, and 7 (43.7%) diabetics. Target vessels were most commonly the left anterior descending (6 [31.6%]) and the right coronary artery (6 [31.6%]). PEB diameter was 2.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.4<!--> <!-->mm with a 31.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.9<!--> <!-->mm length. Stents per patient were 2.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.8. No overlapping stents were deployed. Angiographic success was achieved in 100% of patients. Peri-procedural myocardial infarction occurred in 4 patients (25%). At 6<!--> <!-->months follow-up angiography, MLD was 1.55<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.53<!--> <!-->mm with a late loss of 0.48<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.52<!--> <!-->mm, a binary re-stenosis rate of 2 (12.5%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using PEB with focal stenting by BMS proved to be a feasible, safe, and promising strategy in long coronary lesions. However larger study are needed to confirm these data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91232,"journal":{"name":"Clinical trials and regulatory science in cardiology","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2017.04.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical trials and regulatory science in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405587516300294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Albeit DES might be considered as a breakthrough against neointimal hyperplasia, concerns on stent thrombosis and increase incidence of in-stent restenosis after multiple DES implantations in complex, long lesions still exist. Hereby, we tried to test efficacy and safety of using PEB in long lesions followed by focal BMS implantation in a pilot multicenter study.

Methods

This study enrolled 16 patients with long lesions (> 30 mm) that were treated with PEB angioplasty followed by focal stenting with BMS. IVUS was performed before, after PEB and post stenting. Clinical and angiographic follow-up was done at 6 months. The primary end-point was angiographic late lumen loss.

Results

Patient age was 64.6 ± 8.1 years, 15 (93.7%) were males, and 7 (43.7%) diabetics. Target vessels were most commonly the left anterior descending (6 [31.6%]) and the right coronary artery (6 [31.6%]). PEB diameter was 2.8 ± 0.4 mm with a 31.3 ± 8.9 mm length. Stents per patient were 2.1 ± 0.8. No overlapping stents were deployed. Angiographic success was achieved in 100% of patients. Peri-procedural myocardial infarction occurred in 4 patients (25%). At 6 months follow-up angiography, MLD was 1.55 ± 0.53 mm with a late loss of 0.48 ± 0.52 mm, a binary re-stenosis rate of 2 (12.5%).

Conclusion

Using PEB with focal stenting by BMS proved to be a feasible, safe, and promising strategy in long coronary lesions. However larger study are needed to confirm these data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紫杉醇洗脱球囊加斑点裸金属支架用于弥漫性和非常长的冠状动脉疾病。(PEB-long试验研究)
尽管DES可能被认为是对抗内膜增生的突破,但在复杂、长期病变中多次植入DES后,对支架内血栓形成和增加支架内再狭窄发生率的担忧仍然存在。因此,我们试图在一项多中心试点研究中测试在长期病变后局灶性BMS植入中使用PEB的有效性和安全性。方法本研究纳入16例长病变患者(>30mm),行PEB血管成形术,然后行BMS局部支架置入。在PEB之前、之后和支架植入后进行IVUS。6个月时进行临床及血管造影随访。主要终点为血管造影晚期管腔丧失。结果患者年龄64.6±8.1岁,男性15例(93.7%),糖尿病7例(43.7%)。靶血管以左前降支(6支[31.6%])和右冠状动脉(6支[31.6%])最为常见。PEB直径为2.8±0.4 mm,长度为31.3±8.9 mm。每个患者的支架数为2.1±0.8个。未部署重叠支架。血管造影的成功率为100%。术中发生心肌梗死4例(25%)。随访6个月血管造影时,MLD为1.55±0.53 mm,晚期损失为0.48±0.52 mm,二元再狭窄率为2(12.5%)。结论采用PEB联合BMS局灶性支架置入治疗长冠状动脉病变是一种可行、安全、有前景的治疗策略。然而,需要更大规模的研究来证实这些数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Paclitaxel eluting balloon plus spot bare metal stenting for diffuse and very long coronary disease. (PEB-long pilot study) High prevalence of ST-elevation, early repolarization, and left ventricular hypertrophy during the eligibility assessment for an HIV vaccine trial in young, healthy Tanzanians Using a personalized decision support algorithm for dosing in warfarin treatment: A randomised controlled trial Dose and response to cocoa (DARC): A randomized double-blind controlled trial Massage therapy reduces pain and anxiety after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1