Dose and response to cocoa (DARC): A randomized double-blind controlled trial

Valentine Yanchou Njike MD, MPH , Naomi Hamburg MD , Mark Kellogg PhD , Amarnath Annapureddy MD , Joseph Vita MD
{"title":"Dose and response to cocoa (DARC): A randomized double-blind controlled trial","authors":"Valentine Yanchou Njike MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Naomi Hamburg MD ,&nbsp;Mark Kellogg PhD ,&nbsp;Amarnath Annapureddy MD ,&nbsp;Joseph Vita MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrsc.2016.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Habitual cocoa consumption has been shown to improve cardiometabolic risk. This study compared the effects of two doses of cocoa on blood pressure and other cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with stage 1 hypertension.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Randomized, controlled, modified Latin square parallel design to compare effects of two daily doses (i.e., 5 vs. 10<!--> <!-->g) of cocoa powder in cocoa-containing products for 8<!--> <!-->weeks on cardio-metabolic risk factors in 122 adults (average age 53.6<!--> <!-->years; 63 women and 59 men) with stage 1 hypertension on no more than one medication.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Daily cocoa consumption did not improve (<em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05) blood pressure, endothelial function, lipid profile, or insulin resistance in analyses of our entire sample. Daily consumption of cocoa, compared to placebo, reduced blood pressure in participants on ACE inhibitors (24-hour SBP: −<!--> <!-->3.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9.3 vs. 3.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.5; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.038, 24-hour DBP: −<!--> <!-->2.0<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.0 vs. 2.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.6<!--> <!-->mm<!--> <!-->Hg; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.023), beta blockers (−<!--> <!-->4.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.2 vs. 1.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.8<!--> <!-->mm<!--> <!-->Hg; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009) or diuretics (24-hour SBP 5.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.4 vs. −<!--> <!-->0.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.7; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.022); and improved endothelial function (3.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.3 vs. −<!--> <!-->3.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.4%; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.031) in participants on beta blockers. Dose-response on blood pressure was evident in participants on ACE inhibitors, with more benefit from the high dose compared to the low dose.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Including cocoa in the diet of patients with stage 1 hypertension seems to exert differential beneficial effects on cardiometabolic risk factors in certain sub-groups of patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91232,"journal":{"name":"Clinical trials and regulatory science in cardiology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2016.11.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical trials and regulatory science in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405587516300300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Habitual cocoa consumption has been shown to improve cardiometabolic risk. This study compared the effects of two doses of cocoa on blood pressure and other cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with stage 1 hypertension.

Methods

Randomized, controlled, modified Latin square parallel design to compare effects of two daily doses (i.e., 5 vs. 10 g) of cocoa powder in cocoa-containing products for 8 weeks on cardio-metabolic risk factors in 122 adults (average age 53.6 years; 63 women and 59 men) with stage 1 hypertension on no more than one medication.

Results

Daily cocoa consumption did not improve (p > 0.05) blood pressure, endothelial function, lipid profile, or insulin resistance in analyses of our entire sample. Daily consumption of cocoa, compared to placebo, reduced blood pressure in participants on ACE inhibitors (24-hour SBP: − 3.2 ± 9.3 vs. 3.6 ± 8.5; p = 0.038, 24-hour DBP: − 2.0 ± 5.0 vs. 2.3 ± 5.6 mm Hg; p = 0.023), beta blockers (− 4.6 ± 3.2 vs. 1.8 ± 2.8 mm Hg; p = 0.009) or diuretics (24-hour SBP 5.5 ± 7.4 vs. − 0.6 ± 4.7; p = 0.022); and improved endothelial function (3.1 ± 2.3 vs. − 3.4 ± 7.4%; p = 0.031) in participants on beta blockers. Dose-response on blood pressure was evident in participants on ACE inhibitors, with more benefit from the high dose compared to the low dose.

Conclusions

Including cocoa in the diet of patients with stage 1 hypertension seems to exert differential beneficial effects on cardiometabolic risk factors in certain sub-groups of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可可剂量和反应(DARC):一项随机双盲对照试验
习惯食用可可已被证明可以提高心脏代谢风险。这项研究比较了两种剂量的可可对1期高血压成人血压和其他心脏代谢危险因素的影响。方法采用随机、对照、改良拉丁方平行设计,比较含可可产品中每日两剂量(即5 g vs. 10 g)可可粉8周对122名成人(平均年龄53.6岁;63名女性和59名男性)患有1期高血压,服用不超过一种药物。结果每日食用可可没有改善(p >0.05)血压,内皮功能,血脂,或胰岛素抵抗。与安慰剂相比,每天食用可可可降低ACE抑制剂患者的血压(24小时收缩压:−3.2±9.3 vs. 3.6±8.5;p = 0.038, 24小时:类似−2.0±5.0和2.3±5.6毫米汞柱;p = 0.023),β受体阻滞剂(−4.6±3.2和1.8±2.8毫米汞柱;p = 0.009)或利尿剂(24小时SBP 5.5±7.4 vs−0.6±4.7;p = 0.022);内皮功能改善(3.1±2.3 vs - 3.4±7.4%;P = 0.031)。在服用ACE抑制剂的受试者中,血压的剂量反应是明显的,与低剂量相比,高剂量的获益更多。结论:在1期高血压患者的饮食中加入可可似乎对某些亚组患者的心脏代谢危险因素有不同的有益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Paclitaxel eluting balloon plus spot bare metal stenting for diffuse and very long coronary disease. (PEB-long pilot study) High prevalence of ST-elevation, early repolarization, and left ventricular hypertrophy during the eligibility assessment for an HIV vaccine trial in young, healthy Tanzanians Using a personalized decision support algorithm for dosing in warfarin treatment: A randomised controlled trial Dose and response to cocoa (DARC): A randomized double-blind controlled trial Massage therapy reduces pain and anxiety after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1