Examining Memorable Tourism Experience On Memorable Trip Experience, Subjective Well-Being And Revisit Intention

B. Monica, Dr.N. Thamaraiselvan, Dr. G. Sivanesan
{"title":"Examining Memorable Tourism Experience On Memorable Trip Experience, Subjective Well-Being And Revisit Intention","authors":"B. Monica, Dr.N. Thamaraiselvan, Dr. G. Sivanesan","doi":"10.47750/CIBG.2021.27.03.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The present study examined the memorable tourism experience of Kim et al (2012) dimension on memorable tripe experience, subjective well-being and revisit intention. The data were collected from 362 respondents through online among the tourist in Pondicherry, India. Structural equation modeling was adopted to test the hypotheses developed for the study. The result shown the subjective well-being acted as mediating dimension between memorable trip experience and revisit intention. All the four hypotheses developed for the study were accepted. The results of the inner model demonstrate the interrelationship (including mediation effect) between the different theoretical constructs in the model. Bootstrapping (5000 re-samples), standardized root mean square (SRMR), path analysis, R-square, Stone–Geisser test or blindfolding (predictive relevance or Q 2 ) and effect size (f 2 ) analysis were performed using SmartPLS3 (Ali et al., 2018). A value less than 0.08 for SRMR is considered acceptable for PLS path models (Ali et al., 2018). Results revealed the SRMR value was 0.074, indicating an adequate model. Four path relationships were significant as presented in the above structural model assessment table. This study has few limitations. First it is highly destination specific and based on convenience sampling technique, thus the findings couldn’t be generalize to other tourism destination. Further studies can be conducted in different tourist spot to generalize the significance of this study. Next, the sample consists of only Indian citizens, in future study; foreign tourist can also be included in the sample. Finally other construct can be included to measure memorable tourism experience.","PeriodicalId":40486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/CIBG.2021.27.03.036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: The present study examined the memorable tourism experience of Kim et al (2012) dimension on memorable tripe experience, subjective well-being and revisit intention. The data were collected from 362 respondents through online among the tourist in Pondicherry, India. Structural equation modeling was adopted to test the hypotheses developed for the study. The result shown the subjective well-being acted as mediating dimension between memorable trip experience and revisit intention. All the four hypotheses developed for the study were accepted. The results of the inner model demonstrate the interrelationship (including mediation effect) between the different theoretical constructs in the model. Bootstrapping (5000 re-samples), standardized root mean square (SRMR), path analysis, R-square, Stone–Geisser test or blindfolding (predictive relevance or Q 2 ) and effect size (f 2 ) analysis were performed using SmartPLS3 (Ali et al., 2018). A value less than 0.08 for SRMR is considered acceptable for PLS path models (Ali et al., 2018). Results revealed the SRMR value was 0.074, indicating an adequate model. Four path relationships were significant as presented in the above structural model assessment table. This study has few limitations. First it is highly destination specific and based on convenience sampling technique, thus the findings couldn’t be generalize to other tourism destination. Further studies can be conducted in different tourist spot to generalize the significance of this study. Next, the sample consists of only Indian citizens, in future study; foreign tourist can also be included in the sample. Finally other construct can be included to measure memorable tourism experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
难忘旅游体验:难忘旅行体验、主观幸福感与重游意愿的关系研究
:本研究考察了Kim et al(2012)的难忘旅游体验维度对难忘体验、主观幸福感和重游意愿的影响。这些数据是通过在线方式从印度本地治里郡的362名游客中收集的。采用结构方程模型对研究中提出的假设进行检验。结果表明,主观幸福感在难忘旅行体验与重游意愿之间起中介作用。为这项研究提出的所有四个假设都被接受。内部模型的结果显示了模型中不同理论结构之间的相互关系(包括中介效应)。使用SmartPLS3进行引导(5000个重新样本)、标准化均方根(SRMR)、通径分析、r方、Stone-Geisser检验或蒙眼(预测相关性或q2)和效应大小(f2)分析(Ali等,2018)。对于PLS路径模型,SRMR小于0.08的值被认为是可以接受的(Ali et al., 2018)。结果显示SRMR值为0.074,表明该模型是合适的。如上结构模型评价表所示,四种路径关系显著。本研究几乎没有局限性。首先,该研究具有很强的目的地特异性,基于便利抽样技术,因此研究结果不能推广到其他旅游目的地。进一步的研究可以在不同的旅游景点进行,以概括本研究的意义。其次,在未来的研究中,样本仅由印度公民组成;外国游客也可以包括在样本中。最后,可以纳入其他构念来衡量难忘旅游体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CLOUD COMPUTING AS STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT USING REGRESSION ANALYSIS PERCEPTIONS OF YOUTH ABOUT PROCEDURAL AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE AND THEIR COOPERATION WITH POLICE Use of social media platforms to assess the socio-psychological characteristics of the Arab world population A Mechanism For Forming An Affordable Housing Market: Russian And International Characteristics IMPROVING SHIP REGISTER: TRADITIONAL REGISTRY VERSUS FLAG OF CONVENIENCE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1