Comparison of High Power Pain Threshold Ultrasound and Ischemic Compression Techniques for the Treatment of Latent Myofascial Trigger Points: A Randomized Controlled Study

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.1055/a-1956-3359
G. Pala, E. Mutlu, H. Taskiran
{"title":"Comparison of High Power Pain Threshold Ultrasound and Ischemic Compression Techniques for the Treatment of Latent Myofascial Trigger Points: A Randomized Controlled Study","authors":"G. Pala, E. Mutlu, H. Taskiran","doi":"10.1055/a-1956-3359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) have been defined as discrete and hyperirritable areas located within a taut band of skeletal muscle or fascia, which when compressed produce pain, tenderness, dysfunction and autonomic phenomena. The treatment techniques aimed to return the fiber groups to their optimum length and end plates to their optimum function. Ischemic Compression (IC) and of High Power Pain Threshold Ultrasound (HPPT-US) are among the treatment techniques used for MTrPs. The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy of IC and HTTP-US which was applied in different ways on MTrPs treatment. Patients and Methods This is a randomized prospective study conducted with 153 participants have at least three latent trigger points. Participants received HPPT-US technique in which the intensity is kept constant at the pain level, HPPT-US technique in which the intensity is kept constant at half the pain level or IC. Outcome measures were the Visual Analog Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Neck Pain and Disability Scale, number of deactivated MTrPs and Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT). Results Pain, psychological status and disability improved in each group; there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). PPT increased in each group; a significant difference was found between the groups (p<0.05). IC was slightly more effective than HPPT-US. Conclusion Our results have shown that HPPT-US which was applied in different ways and IC were effective therapies for latent trigger points.","PeriodicalId":54611,"journal":{"name":"Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin","volume":"33 1","pages":"219 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1956-3359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) have been defined as discrete and hyperirritable areas located within a taut band of skeletal muscle or fascia, which when compressed produce pain, tenderness, dysfunction and autonomic phenomena. The treatment techniques aimed to return the fiber groups to their optimum length and end plates to their optimum function. Ischemic Compression (IC) and of High Power Pain Threshold Ultrasound (HPPT-US) are among the treatment techniques used for MTrPs. The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy of IC and HTTP-US which was applied in different ways on MTrPs treatment. Patients and Methods This is a randomized prospective study conducted with 153 participants have at least three latent trigger points. Participants received HPPT-US technique in which the intensity is kept constant at the pain level, HPPT-US technique in which the intensity is kept constant at half the pain level or IC. Outcome measures were the Visual Analog Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Neck Pain and Disability Scale, number of deactivated MTrPs and Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT). Results Pain, psychological status and disability improved in each group; there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). PPT increased in each group; a significant difference was found between the groups (p<0.05). IC was slightly more effective than HPPT-US. Conclusion Our results have shown that HPPT-US which was applied in different ways and IC were effective therapies for latent trigger points.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高功率痛阈超声和缺血压迫技术治疗肌筋膜潜伏触发点的比较:一项随机对照研究
摘要目的肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)被定义为位于骨骼肌或筋膜紧绷带内的离散和高激区域,当这些区域受到压迫时会产生疼痛、压痛、功能障碍和自主神经现象。处理技术的目的是使纤维群恢复到最佳长度,并使端板恢复到最佳功能。缺血性压迫(IC)和高功率痛阈超声(hpt - us)是MTrPs的治疗技术之一。本研究的目的是比较IC和HTTP-US在MTrPs治疗中的不同应用方式的疗效。患者和方法这是一项随机前瞻性研究,153名参与者至少有三个潜在触发点。参与者接受hpt - us技术,其中强度保持在疼痛水平不变,hpt - us技术中强度保持在疼痛水平的一半或IC不变。结果测量是视觉模拟量表,贝克抑郁量表,颈部疼痛和残疾量表,失活的MTrPs数量和疼痛压力阈值(PPT)。结果两组患者疼痛、心理状态和残疾情况均有改善;两组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。各组PPT均增加;两组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。IC比hpt - us更有效。结论不同应用方式的HPPT-US和IC是治疗潜在触发点的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine offers you the most up-to-date information about physical medicine in clinic and practice, as well as interdisciplinary information about rehabilitation medicine and spa medicine. Publishing 6 issues a year, the journal includes selected original research articles and reviews as well as guidelines and summaries of the latest research findings. The journal also publishes society news and editorial material. “Online first” publication ensures rapid dissemination of knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Welche Kontextfaktoren der ICF haben für die sozialmedizinische Begutachtung im Rahmen der Erwerbsminderungsrente eine Relevanz? Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Befragung Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Orthesenversorgung für die untere Extremität Achillessehnenruptur: konservativ oder operativ behandeln? Deutsche Gesellschaft für Physikalische und Rehabilitative Medizin e. V. Einfluss von Hydrotherapie auf die Fatigue-Symptomatik – ein narratives Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1