Survey of Australian Dietitians Contemporary Practice and Dietetic Interventions in Overweight and Obesity: An Update of Current Practice

E. Clarke, Rebecca L. Haslam, J. Baldwin, T. Burrows, L. Ashton, C. Collins
{"title":"Survey of Australian Dietitians Contemporary Practice and Dietetic Interventions in Overweight and Obesity: An Update of Current Practice","authors":"E. Clarke, Rebecca L. Haslam, J. Baldwin, T. Burrows, L. Ashton, C. Collins","doi":"10.3390/dietetics2010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this survey was to identify, (1) use of Dietitians Australia best practice guidelines, (2) contemporary practices/knowledge, and (3) professional development needs of Australian dietitians in relation to management of clients with overweight or obesity. A cross-sectional online survey consisting of 67 multiple choice and Likert scale questions on the three survey aims was administered. Data were collected between 2020–2021 and reported descriptively as frequency (%). Of 178 survey attempts, 80 respondents completed all questions (45%). Most respondents spent >50% of their time working with individuals with overweight/obesity, usually in private practice (47%). Two thirds of respondents had accessed best practice guidelines, but only 12% had completely read best practice guidelines. General healthy eating was the most frequent dietary approach used (77%). Seventy-five percent (n = 56) of dietitians reported that dietary interventions were selected based on client preference. Almost half of dietitians rated their knowledge and level of skill in management of obesity as good. Approximately 60% (n = 41) dietitians reported their skill gap was related to providing behavioural therapy/counselling. Results of the current survey indicate that use of best practice guidelines is low. However, dietitians surveyed reported that they had a good understanding of obesity management and choose a client centred approach to management, which is in line with current recommendations. Professional development activities, particularly regarding behavioural counselling are of particular interest to dietitians working with individuals with obesity.","PeriodicalId":72810,"journal":{"name":"Dietetics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dietetics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dietetics2010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this survey was to identify, (1) use of Dietitians Australia best practice guidelines, (2) contemporary practices/knowledge, and (3) professional development needs of Australian dietitians in relation to management of clients with overweight or obesity. A cross-sectional online survey consisting of 67 multiple choice and Likert scale questions on the three survey aims was administered. Data were collected between 2020–2021 and reported descriptively as frequency (%). Of 178 survey attempts, 80 respondents completed all questions (45%). Most respondents spent >50% of their time working with individuals with overweight/obesity, usually in private practice (47%). Two thirds of respondents had accessed best practice guidelines, but only 12% had completely read best practice guidelines. General healthy eating was the most frequent dietary approach used (77%). Seventy-five percent (n = 56) of dietitians reported that dietary interventions were selected based on client preference. Almost half of dietitians rated their knowledge and level of skill in management of obesity as good. Approximately 60% (n = 41) dietitians reported their skill gap was related to providing behavioural therapy/counselling. Results of the current survey indicate that use of best practice guidelines is low. However, dietitians surveyed reported that they had a good understanding of obesity management and choose a client centred approach to management, which is in line with current recommendations. Professional development activities, particularly regarding behavioural counselling are of particular interest to dietitians working with individuals with obesity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚营养师对超重和肥胖的当代实践和饮食干预的调查:当前实践的更新
本次调查的目的是确定(1)澳大利亚营养师最佳实践指南的使用,(2)当代实践/知识,以及(3)澳大利亚营养师在超重或肥胖客户管理方面的专业发展需求。横断面在线调查由67个选择题和李克特量表问题组成,涉及三个调查目标。数据收集于2020-2021年,描述性报告频率(%)。在178次调查中,80名受访者完成了所有问题(45%)。大多数受访者将50%的时间用于治疗超重/肥胖患者,通常是在私人诊所(47%)。三分之二的受访者访问了最佳实践指南,但只有12%的受访者完全阅读了最佳实践指南。一般健康饮食是最常用的饮食方式(77%)。75% (n = 56)的营养师报告说,饮食干预是根据客户偏好选择的。几乎一半的营养师认为他们在肥胖管理方面的知识和技能水平是好的。大约60% (n = 41)的营养师报告他们的技能差距与提供行为治疗/咨询有关。目前的调查结果表明,最佳实践指南的使用率很低。然而,接受调查的营养师报告说,他们对肥胖管理有很好的理解,并选择以客户为中心的管理方法,这与目前的建议是一致的。专业发展活动,特别是关于行为咨询的活动,是与肥胖患者一起工作的营养师特别感兴趣的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Self-Reported Dietary Intake to Provided Diet during a Randomized Controlled Feeding Intervention: A Pilot Study. Historical Perspective and Current State Review: Advancing Lifelong Learning and Continuing Professional Education in Nutrition and Dietetics to Expand Opportunities, Equity, Access, and Future Transformations A Narrative Review of the Tale of the Dysbiotic Microbiome in the Preterm Neonate Exercise-Induced Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Endurance Sports: A Review of Pathophysiology, Symptoms, and Nutritional Management The Lower the Better? Discussion on Non-Alcoholic Wine and Its Marketing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1