Self-efficacy and cues to action: Two main predictors of modified version of diet quality index in Iranian adolescents

4区 医学 Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Progress in Nutrition Pub Date : 2018-02-08 DOI:10.23751/PN.V20I2.6711
P. Keshani, M. Salehi, M. Kaveh, S. Faghih
{"title":"Self-efficacy and cues to action: Two main predictors of modified version of diet quality index in Iranian adolescents","authors":"P. Keshani, M. Salehi, M. Kaveh, S. Faghih","doi":"10.23751/PN.V20I2.6711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between health belief model (HBM) constructs and a modified version of diet quality index in Iranian adolescents. Methods: One thousand and fifty five adolescents aged 13-15 years old completed this cross-sectional study. Participants were selected from secondary schools in Shiraz, one of the megacities of Iran, using stratified random sampling. A modified version of revised children’s diet quality index (M-RCDQI), was calculated for each adolescents and its association with the model construct was assessed using linear regression. Results: Mean M-RCDQI score was 58.91±8.58 out of the total of 90 points. Among the M-RCDQI components, the worse scores were obtained by dairy intake, dietary fiber and vegetables in which less than 20% of the students reached maximum score. Among HBM constructs, cues to action (B=0.194, p=0.003) and self-efficacy (B=0.04, p=0.007) had positive, significant association with adolescents’ diet quality. Also there was a positive, significant association between cues to action and fruits consumption (B=0.026, P=0.026), and a negative significant association was seen between cues to action and total fat intake (B=-0.629, p=0.021). Furthermore, self-efficacy had a direct significant association with dairy intake. Conclusion: M-RCDQI could be a suitable tool for assessment of diet quality index and it is recommended for use in further studies in similar populations. Cues to action and self-efficacy would both be effective mediators in improvement of nutritional behavior among adolescents.","PeriodicalId":20600,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23751/PN.V20I2.6711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between health belief model (HBM) constructs and a modified version of diet quality index in Iranian adolescents. Methods: One thousand and fifty five adolescents aged 13-15 years old completed this cross-sectional study. Participants were selected from secondary schools in Shiraz, one of the megacities of Iran, using stratified random sampling. A modified version of revised children’s diet quality index (M-RCDQI), was calculated for each adolescents and its association with the model construct was assessed using linear regression. Results: Mean M-RCDQI score was 58.91±8.58 out of the total of 90 points. Among the M-RCDQI components, the worse scores were obtained by dairy intake, dietary fiber and vegetables in which less than 20% of the students reached maximum score. Among HBM constructs, cues to action (B=0.194, p=0.003) and self-efficacy (B=0.04, p=0.007) had positive, significant association with adolescents’ diet quality. Also there was a positive, significant association between cues to action and fruits consumption (B=0.026, P=0.026), and a negative significant association was seen between cues to action and total fat intake (B=-0.629, p=0.021). Furthermore, self-efficacy had a direct significant association with dairy intake. Conclusion: M-RCDQI could be a suitable tool for assessment of diet quality index and it is recommended for use in further studies in similar populations. Cues to action and self-efficacy would both be effective mediators in improvement of nutritional behavior among adolescents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我效能感和行动提示:伊朗青少年改良版饮食质量指数的两个主要预测因子
背景:本研究的目的是检验伊朗青少年的健康信念模型(HBM)结构与改良版饮食质量指数之间的关系。方法:一百五十五名13-15岁的青少年完成了这项横断面研究。参与者是从伊朗特大城市之一设拉子的中学中选择的,采用分层随机抽样。计算每个青少年的修订版儿童饮食质量指数(M-RCDQI),并使用线性回归评估其与模型构建的相关性。结果:90分中M-RCDQI平均得分为58.91±8.58分。在M-RCDQI成分中,乳制品摄入、膳食纤维和蔬菜得分最差,其中只有不到20%的学生达到最高得分。在HBM结构中,行动线索(B=0.194,p=0.003)和自我效能感(B=0.04,p=0.007)与青少年的饮食质量呈正相关。此外,行动提示与水果消费之间存在正相关(P=0.026,P=0.026),行动提示和总脂肪摄入量之间存在负相关(B=-0.629,P=0.021)。此外,自我效能感与乳制品摄入量有直接显著关联。结论:M-RCDQI可作为评估膳食质量指数的一种合适的工具,建议在类似人群的进一步研究中使用。行动提示和自我效能都是改善青少年营养行为的有效中介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Nutrition
Progress in Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Nutrition was founded in 1999 as an independent magazine, a multidisciplinary approach, dedicated to issues of nutrition and metabolism.
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 and nutrition implications: A review Effect of the addition of whey protein-basil seed gum on the quality, properties, and antioxidant activities of low-fat mayonnaise Proximate composition, phytochemical screening and antihyperglycemic effect of elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius) tuber on alloxan induced diabetic rats Investigation of associations between the effects of COVID-19 fear on school administrators and nutrition an problematic eating behaviors Acute influence of caffeinated commercially available energy drink on performance, perceived exertion and blood lactate in youth female water polo players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1