Fact, fiction or Photoshop: Building awareness of visual manipulation through image editing software

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Visual Literacy Pub Date : 2021-03-26 DOI:10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902041
J. Swerzenski
{"title":"Fact, fiction or Photoshop: Building awareness of visual manipulation through image editing software","authors":"J. Swerzenski","doi":"10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Among the most difficult aspects of building visual literacy is creating awareness of manipulation, a task made continuously harder by the prevalence of ‘Photoshopped’ or digitally altered photos through fake news or our everyday usage of photo editing apps. So how are educators to build awareness of visual literacy when manipulation has become ubiquitous? I argue that understanding the credibility of visual content must go beyond viewing the image as identifying whether a photo has or has not been manipulated. Instead, it requires a technical comprehension of the process by which images are created, allowing educators to discern between visual lies and everyday image editing. To this end, I position Photoshop as a teaching tool, one that offers educators and students a backstage view at the mechanisms of image alteration technology. In building a technical and rhetorical understanding of three key Photoshop tools—airbrush, layers, and filters—I outline a guide for using these tools grounded in critical considerations of how their use affects visual meaning. From this understanding, educators can move beyond blanket criticism of visual manipulation and into the ethical nuances of photo editing that distinguish meme from misinformation.","PeriodicalId":36535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Literacy","volume":"40 1","pages":"104 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902041","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Among the most difficult aspects of building visual literacy is creating awareness of manipulation, a task made continuously harder by the prevalence of ‘Photoshopped’ or digitally altered photos through fake news or our everyday usage of photo editing apps. So how are educators to build awareness of visual literacy when manipulation has become ubiquitous? I argue that understanding the credibility of visual content must go beyond viewing the image as identifying whether a photo has or has not been manipulated. Instead, it requires a technical comprehension of the process by which images are created, allowing educators to discern between visual lies and everyday image editing. To this end, I position Photoshop as a teaching tool, one that offers educators and students a backstage view at the mechanisms of image alteration technology. In building a technical and rhetorical understanding of three key Photoshop tools—airbrush, layers, and filters—I outline a guide for using these tools grounded in critical considerations of how their use affects visual meaning. From this understanding, educators can move beyond blanket criticism of visual manipulation and into the ethical nuances of photo editing that distinguish meme from misinformation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
事实、虚构或Photoshop:通过图像编辑软件建立视觉操纵的意识
培养视觉素养最困难的方面之一是建立对操纵的意识,由于“ps”或通过假新闻或我们日常使用的照片编辑应用程序进行数字修改的照片的流行,这项任务不断变得更加困难。那么,当操纵变得无处不在时,教育者该如何培养视觉素养的意识呢?我认为,要理解视觉内容的可信度,必须超越仅仅通过观看图像来识别照片是否被篡改。相反,它需要对图像创建过程的技术理解,使教育者能够区分视觉谎言和日常图像编辑。为此,我将Photoshop定位为一种教学工具,为教育工作者和学生提供图像修改技术机制的后台视图。在对三个关键的Photoshop工具——喷枪、图层和滤镜——建立技术和修辞上的理解时,我概述了一个使用这些工具的指南,这些工具的使用基于对它们的使用如何影响视觉意义的关键考虑。从这种理解出发,教育工作者可以超越对视觉操纵的笼统批评,进入照片编辑的道德细微差别,将模因与错误信息区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Literacy
Journal of Visual Literacy Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Transformative pedagogy and visual Literacy: reframing art and design student perspectives on sustainability with illustrated infographics Infographic creation as an essential skill for highly visual Gen Alpha Integration of infographics in higher education: challenges faced by novice creators A bibliometric exploration of infographics as tools for visual literacy in education Individual and collaborative infographic design and cognitive strategies in visual literacy support process: a qualitative research perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1