Joining the dots: theorising professionalism in the English Further Education Sector

Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13596748.2021.2011510
Paul Tully
{"title":"Joining the dots: theorising professionalism in the English Further Education Sector","authors":"Paul Tully","doi":"10.1080/13596748.2021.2011510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Professionalism is an important issue for policymakers in post-16 education because of its established links to competence, morale and staff continuity. Arguably, it is the pursuit of professionalism that ensures high quality teaching and learning, satisfied students and stakeholders, and the ongoing esteem of the general public. However, despite its alleged importance, professionalism has been largely missing as a topic from policy narratives. This lacuna may be linked to common perceptions that professionalism is complex, opaque and difficult to operationalise. Redressing this issue, this article examines what professionalism means to practitioners who work in the English Further Education (FE) sector. 461 practitioners working in teaching, management and curriculum settings completed an online survey, responding to the question: ‘What does being professional mean to you in the context of your working role and duties’? Perceptions of professionalism were content analysed and reported thematically. Using two-way correspondence analysis, the results were theorised as a tripartite model comprising three intersecting professionalism schemas: expertise, service and compliance. This model provides the basis for understanding and exploring the contested properties of professionalism expressed across the FE literature. Uniquely, the model emphasises the role that recognition plays in respondents’ constructions. The article concludes by suggesting a number of ways professionalism in FE might be supported.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2021.2011510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Professionalism is an important issue for policymakers in post-16 education because of its established links to competence, morale and staff continuity. Arguably, it is the pursuit of professionalism that ensures high quality teaching and learning, satisfied students and stakeholders, and the ongoing esteem of the general public. However, despite its alleged importance, professionalism has been largely missing as a topic from policy narratives. This lacuna may be linked to common perceptions that professionalism is complex, opaque and difficult to operationalise. Redressing this issue, this article examines what professionalism means to practitioners who work in the English Further Education (FE) sector. 461 practitioners working in teaching, management and curriculum settings completed an online survey, responding to the question: ‘What does being professional mean to you in the context of your working role and duties’? Perceptions of professionalism were content analysed and reported thematically. Using two-way correspondence analysis, the results were theorised as a tripartite model comprising three intersecting professionalism schemas: expertise, service and compliance. This model provides the basis for understanding and exploring the contested properties of professionalism expressed across the FE literature. Uniquely, the model emphasises the role that recognition plays in respondents’ constructions. The article concludes by suggesting a number of ways professionalism in FE might be supported.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
加入点:英语继续教育领域的专业理论
专业精神是16岁后教育政策制定者的一个重要问题,因为它与能力、士气和员工连续性建立了联系。可以说,正是对专业精神的追求,确保了高质量的教学和学习,让学生和利益相关者满意,并得到了公众的持续尊重。然而,尽管职业化被认为很重要,但在政策叙述中,职业化在很大程度上是一个缺失的话题。这种缺失可能与人们普遍认为专业精神复杂、不透明且难以实施有关。为了解决这个问题,本文探讨了专业精神对在英语继续教育(FE)部门工作的从业者意味着什么。461名在教学、管理和课程设置领域工作的从业者完成了一项在线调查,回答了“在你的工作角色和职责中,专业对你意味着什么”这个问题。对专业精神的看法进行了内容分析和专题报告。使用双向对应分析,结果被理论化为一个三方模型,包括三个交叉的专业主义图式:专业知识、服务和遵守。这个模型为理解和探索在FE文献中表达的专业主义有争议的属性提供了基础。独特的是,该模型强调了认知在被调查者的建构中所起的作用。文章最后提出了一些支持财经专业的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1