Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Global Sustainability Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.1017/sus.2022.7
E. A. Moallemi, Lei Gao, S. Eker, B. Bryan
{"title":"Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways","authors":"E. A. Moallemi, Lei Gao, S. Eker, B. Bryan","doi":"10.1017/sus.2022.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-technical summary Models are increasingly used to inform the transformation of human–Earth systems towards a sustainable future, aligned with the sustainable development goals (SDGs). We argue that a greater diversity of models ought to be used for sustainability analysis to better address complexity and uncertainty. We articulate the steps to model global change socioeconomic and climatic scenarios with new models. Through these steps, we generate new scenario projections using a human–Earth system dynamics model. Our modelling brings new insights about the sensitivity of sustainability trends to future uncertainty and their alignment with or divergence from previous model-based scenario projections. Technical summary The future uncertainty and complexity of alternative socioeconomic and climatic scenarios challenge the model-based analysis of sustainable development. Obtaining robust insights requires a systematic processing of uncertainty and complexity not only in input assumptions, but also in the diversity of model structures that simulates the multisectoral dynamics of human and Earth system interactions. Here, we implement the global change scenarios, that is, the shared socioeconomic pathways and the representative concentration pathways, in a feedback-rich, integrated assessment model (IAM) of human–Earth system dynamics, called FeliX, to serve two aims: (1) to provide modellers with well-defined steps for the adoption of established scenarios in new IAMs and (2) to explore the impacts of model uncertainty and its structural complexity on the projection of these scenarios for sustainable development. Our modelling shows internally consistent scenario storylines across sectors, yet with quantitatively different realisations of these scenarios compared to other IAMs due to the new model's structural complexity. The results highlight the importance of enumerating global change scenarios and their uncertainty exploration with a diversity of models of different input assumptions and structures to capture a wider variety of future possibilities and sustainability indicators. Social media summary New study highlights the importance of global change scenario analysis with new, SDG-focused IAMs.","PeriodicalId":36849,"journal":{"name":"Global Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2022.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Non-technical summary Models are increasingly used to inform the transformation of human–Earth systems towards a sustainable future, aligned with the sustainable development goals (SDGs). We argue that a greater diversity of models ought to be used for sustainability analysis to better address complexity and uncertainty. We articulate the steps to model global change socioeconomic and climatic scenarios with new models. Through these steps, we generate new scenario projections using a human–Earth system dynamics model. Our modelling brings new insights about the sensitivity of sustainability trends to future uncertainty and their alignment with or divergence from previous model-based scenario projections. Technical summary The future uncertainty and complexity of alternative socioeconomic and climatic scenarios challenge the model-based analysis of sustainable development. Obtaining robust insights requires a systematic processing of uncertainty and complexity not only in input assumptions, but also in the diversity of model structures that simulates the multisectoral dynamics of human and Earth system interactions. Here, we implement the global change scenarios, that is, the shared socioeconomic pathways and the representative concentration pathways, in a feedback-rich, integrated assessment model (IAM) of human–Earth system dynamics, called FeliX, to serve two aims: (1) to provide modellers with well-defined steps for the adoption of established scenarios in new IAMs and (2) to explore the impacts of model uncertainty and its structural complexity on the projection of these scenarios for sustainable development. Our modelling shows internally consistent scenario storylines across sectors, yet with quantitatively different realisations of these scenarios compared to other IAMs due to the new model's structural complexity. The results highlight the importance of enumerating global change scenarios and their uncertainty exploration with a diversity of models of different input assumptions and structures to capture a wider variety of future possibilities and sustainability indicators. Social media summary New study highlights the importance of global change scenario analysis with new, SDG-focused IAMs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析全球变化情景和可持续发展途径的多样化模型
非技术总结模型越来越多地用于为人类-地球系统向可持续未来的转变提供信息,与可持续发展目标(sdg)保持一致。我们认为,应该使用更多样化的模型进行可持续性分析,以更好地解决复杂性和不确定性。我们阐明了用新模型模拟全球变化、社会经济和气候情景的步骤。通过这些步骤,我们使用人类-地球系统动力学模型生成新的情景预测。我们的模型对可持续性趋势对未来不确定性的敏感性及其与以往基于模型的情景预测的一致性或差异性提出了新的见解。未来社会经济和气候情景的不确定性和复杂性对基于模式的可持续发展分析提出了挑战。获得可靠的见解需要系统地处理不确定性和复杂性,不仅在输入假设中,而且在模拟人类和地球系统相互作用的多部门动态的模型结构的多样性中。在此,我们将全球变化情景,即共享的社会经济路径和具有代表性的集中路径,在一个名为FeliX的人类-地球系统动力学的反馈丰富的综合评估模型(IAM)中实现,以实现两个目标:(1)为建模者提供在新的iam中采用已建立情景的明确步骤;(2)探索模式不确定性及其结构复杂性对这些情景对可持续发展的预测的影响。我们的模型显示了跨部门内部一致的情景故事情节,但由于新模型的结构复杂性,与其他iam相比,这些情景的定量实现不同。结果强调了列举全球变化情景及其不确定性探索的重要性,这些不确定性探索采用不同输入假设和结构的多样性模型,以获取更广泛的未来可能性和可持续性指标。一项新的研究强调了全球变化情景分析的重要性,新的、以可持续发展目标为重点的iam。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
19
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Why Not in My Backyard? (W-NIMBY): The potential of design-driven environmental infrastructure to foster greater acceptance among host communities Reflections on the past and future of whole Earth system science Leveraging capacity for transformative sustainability science: a theory of change from the Future Earth Pathways Initiative Three Perspectives on Enabling Local Actions for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Twenty-five rice research priorities for sustainable rice systems by 2050
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1