Acceptance of repeat cesarean section and its determinants among a Nigerian pregnant women population

Q4 Medicine Sahel Medical Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.4103/smj.smj_4_20
R. Maduka, N. Enaruna
{"title":"Acceptance of repeat cesarean section and its determinants among a Nigerian pregnant women population","authors":"R. Maduka, N. Enaruna","doi":"10.4103/smj.smj_4_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many women who need caesarian section in most sub Saharan Africa do not get it or do so too late, thereby resulting in an unnecessary increase in maternal and perinatal adverse outcome. Refusal of caesarian section has been attributed to poverty and sociocultural factors. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the level of acceptance of repeat cesarean section (CS) among pregnant women attending care in a government-funded health facility with a policy of free maternity care services. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed 157 consecutive consenting antenatal clinic clients with previous CS presenting for booking in Central Hospital, Agbor, Delta State, Nigeria. The women completed a questionnaire with sections on sociodemographic attributes, inquiry about previous CS outcome and associated factors, a desire to accept a repeat CS if clinically indicated in index pregnancy, as well as reasons to decline a repeat CS. Results: The acceptance rate of repeat CS was 54%. Women with two or more previous CS were more likely to accept repeat CS (71.8% vs. 48.3%, prevalence ratio: 1.5; P = 0.02). There was no sociodemographic variable or any event related to the previous CS which was significantly associated with the women's choice regarding repeat CS. The rejection of repeat CS was mainly due to concerns about postoperative pain and being tagged with “failure of womanhood.” Conclusions: The level of acceptance of repeat CS in Central Hospital, Agbor, is low despite the policy of free maternity care. Along with the increasing effort to make health care affordable, attention needs to be paid to the role of patient and community engagement in the form of health education and continuous counseling to address noncost barriers to achieving improved maternal and perinatal health indices.","PeriodicalId":52324,"journal":{"name":"Sahel Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sahel Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/smj.smj_4_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Many women who need caesarian section in most sub Saharan Africa do not get it or do so too late, thereby resulting in an unnecessary increase in maternal and perinatal adverse outcome. Refusal of caesarian section has been attributed to poverty and sociocultural factors. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the level of acceptance of repeat cesarean section (CS) among pregnant women attending care in a government-funded health facility with a policy of free maternity care services. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed 157 consecutive consenting antenatal clinic clients with previous CS presenting for booking in Central Hospital, Agbor, Delta State, Nigeria. The women completed a questionnaire with sections on sociodemographic attributes, inquiry about previous CS outcome and associated factors, a desire to accept a repeat CS if clinically indicated in index pregnancy, as well as reasons to decline a repeat CS. Results: The acceptance rate of repeat CS was 54%. Women with two or more previous CS were more likely to accept repeat CS (71.8% vs. 48.3%, prevalence ratio: 1.5; P = 0.02). There was no sociodemographic variable or any event related to the previous CS which was significantly associated with the women's choice regarding repeat CS. The rejection of repeat CS was mainly due to concerns about postoperative pain and being tagged with “failure of womanhood.” Conclusions: The level of acceptance of repeat CS in Central Hospital, Agbor, is low despite the policy of free maternity care. Along with the increasing effort to make health care affordable, attention needs to be paid to the role of patient and community engagement in the form of health education and continuous counseling to address noncost barriers to achieving improved maternal and perinatal health indices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚孕妇接受重复剖宫产手术及其决定因素
背景:在大多数撒哈拉以南非洲地区,许多需要剖腹产的妇女没有得到剖腹产,或者做得太晚,从而导致产妇和围产期不良后果的不必要增加。拒绝剖腹产被归因于贫困和社会文化因素。目的:本研究的目的是确定在政府资助的医疗机构接受重复剖宫产(CS)的孕妇接受程度,该医疗机构实行免费产妇护理服务政策。材料和方法:这项横断面研究调查了157名连续同意在尼日利亚三角洲州阿格博尔中央医院接受CS预约的产前诊所客户。这些女性完成了一份问卷,其中包括社会人口统计学属性、对既往CS结果和相关因素的询问、如果在指数妊娠中出现临床症状,是否愿意接受重复CS,以及拒绝重复CS的原因。结果:重复CS的接受率为54%。有两次或两次以上既往CS的女性更有可能接受重复CS(71.8%对48.3%,患病率:1.5;P=0.02)。没有与既往CS相关的社会人口学变量或任何事件与女性选择重复CS显著相关。重复CS的排斥反应主要是由于担心术后疼痛和被贴上“女性失败”的标签。结论:尽管有免费产妇护理政策,但Agbor中心医院对重复CS的接受程度较低。随着越来越多的努力使医疗保健负担得起,需要注意患者和社区参与的作用,以健康教育和持续咨询的形式,解决提高孕产妇和围产期健康指数的非成本障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sahel Medical Journal
Sahel Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinico-Demographic characteristics, morbidity and mortality patterns of sickle cell disease in a tertiary institution Osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the obese patient: Do metabolic factors play a role? Effect of varying storage time and temperature on unspun blood samples for prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time in a tertiary hospital laboratory in the tropics Association between hormonal contraceptive use and derangement of lipid profile among women attending Muhoza Health Center, Rwanda Pattern of contraceptive choice among clients attending a tertiary health institution in Ogbomoso, Southwestern Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1