Motivation to use digital educational content – differences between science and other STEM students in higher education

IF 2.2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Chemistry Teacher International : best practices in chemistry education Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1515/cti-2022-0035
Carolin Flerlage, Andrea Bernholt, I. Parchmann
{"title":"Motivation to use digital educational content – differences between science and other STEM students in higher education","authors":"Carolin Flerlage, Andrea Bernholt, I. Parchmann","doi":"10.1515/cti-2022-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Digitalization leads to an increased importance of digital educational content for learning in higher education as well as in the sciences. The investigation of individual factors (e.g., motivation, self-efficacy, attitudes) influencing the intention to use digital educational content is a major research interest in design and implementation of suitable content (Hsu, J.-Y., Chen, C.-C., & Ting, P.-F. (2018). Understanding MOOC continuance: An empirical examination of social support theory. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1100–1118), yet to date without differentiation by discipline. A questionnaire following the Theory of Planned Behavior (Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10462474) was developed to analyze relationships between STEM students’ individual beliefs and their personal motivation to use digital educational content. In November 2021, a total of 662 STEM students from 8 universities in Germany participated in the study. Analyses showed differences within the group of STEM students: science students rated their digital skills lower and expected more difficulties compared to other STEM students, but did not differ in terms of their motivation. For science students, unlike other STEM students, motivation was predicted only by attitudes and digital skills. Moreover, the present results suggest that, first, the focus of the design should be on learning environment rather than on digital tools, and second, the potential of collaboration is largely unrecognized by students.","PeriodicalId":93272,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Teacher International : best practices in chemistry education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Teacher International : best practices in chemistry education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Digitalization leads to an increased importance of digital educational content for learning in higher education as well as in the sciences. The investigation of individual factors (e.g., motivation, self-efficacy, attitudes) influencing the intention to use digital educational content is a major research interest in design and implementation of suitable content (Hsu, J.-Y., Chen, C.-C., & Ting, P.-F. (2018). Understanding MOOC continuance: An empirical examination of social support theory. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1100–1118), yet to date without differentiation by discipline. A questionnaire following the Theory of Planned Behavior (Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10462474) was developed to analyze relationships between STEM students’ individual beliefs and their personal motivation to use digital educational content. In November 2021, a total of 662 STEM students from 8 universities in Germany participated in the study. Analyses showed differences within the group of STEM students: science students rated their digital skills lower and expected more difficulties compared to other STEM students, but did not differ in terms of their motivation. For science students, unlike other STEM students, motivation was predicted only by attitudes and digital skills. Moreover, the present results suggest that, first, the focus of the design should be on learning environment rather than on digital tools, and second, the potential of collaboration is largely unrecognized by students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用数字教育内容的动机——高等教育中科学和其他STEM学生之间的差异
摘要数字化使数字教育内容在高等教育和科学领域的学习中变得越来越重要。对影响使用数字教育内容意图的个人因素(如动机、自我效能感、态度)的调查是设计和实施合适内容的主要研究兴趣(Hsu,J.-Y,Chen,C.-C,&Ting,P.-F.(2018)。理解MOOC持续性:社会支持理论的实证检验。交互式学习环境,26(8),1100–1118),迄今为止尚未按学科进行区分。遵循计划行为理论的问卷调查(Fishbein,M.,&Ajzen,I.(2010)。预测和改变行为:理性行动方法。心理学出版社。http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10462474)旨在分析STEM学生的个人信仰和他们使用数字教育内容的个人动机之间的关系。2021年11月,共有来自德国8所大学的662名STEM学生参与了这项研究。分析显示,STEM学生群体内部存在差异:与其他STEM学生相比,理科学生的数字技能评分较低,预计会遇到更多困难,但在动机方面没有差异。对于理科学生来说,与其他STEM学生不同,动机只能通过态度和数字技能来预测。此外,目前的研究结果表明,首先,设计的重点应该放在学习环境上,而不是数字工具上;其次,学生们在很大程度上没有认识到合作的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the relationship between students’ argumentation and chemical representational ability: a case study of hybrid learning oriented in the environmental chemistry course University and local recyclable material cooperative – building bridges around e-waste Designing a learning environment based on the spiral of skills to overcome the didactic obstacles associated with teaching the Daniell cell Does it occur or not? – A structured approach to support students in determining the spontaneity of chemical reactions Relativistic effects on the chemistry of heavier elements: why not given proper importance in chemistry education at the undergraduate and postgraduate level?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1