Book Review: Hunger, Whiteness and Religion in Neoliberal Britain by Maddy Power

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2022-10-14 DOI:10.1177/02610183221120547e
Katy Gordon
{"title":"Book Review: Hunger, Whiteness and Religion in Neoliberal Britain by Maddy Power","authors":"Katy Gordon","doi":"10.1177/02610183221120547e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and economic policies that increased inequality, reduced welfare payments and entitlement, and cut services. These are all factors that contribute to higher levels of mental distress across society Moth’s research demonstrates how professionals focus on service users becoming ‘responsible consumers’ who manage their own risk. In these twin processes, a broader social approach to mental distress that explores the social determinants of health (Karban, 2016) is lost. These trends have been exacerbated by austerity which saw further welfare retrenchment and measures that were specifically targeted at people living with disabilities. One of the striking features of this volume is that there are significant overlaps between the views of service users and CHMT staff. Both groups recognize mental health services are replicating some of the failings of institutionalized psychiatry. Modern mental health work has become defensive casework and risk management with a focus on compliance with medication. Moth concludes that the challenge to this approach will not come from service reforms that are rooted in neoliberal policy agendas. This can only come from progressive alliances that focus on promoting relationship-based work and a focus on broader social justice.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"42 1","pages":"751 - 753"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221120547e","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

and economic policies that increased inequality, reduced welfare payments and entitlement, and cut services. These are all factors that contribute to higher levels of mental distress across society Moth’s research demonstrates how professionals focus on service users becoming ‘responsible consumers’ who manage their own risk. In these twin processes, a broader social approach to mental distress that explores the social determinants of health (Karban, 2016) is lost. These trends have been exacerbated by austerity which saw further welfare retrenchment and measures that were specifically targeted at people living with disabilities. One of the striking features of this volume is that there are significant overlaps between the views of service users and CHMT staff. Both groups recognize mental health services are replicating some of the failings of institutionalized psychiatry. Modern mental health work has become defensive casework and risk management with a focus on compliance with medication. Moth concludes that the challenge to this approach will not come from service reforms that are rooted in neoliberal policy agendas. This can only come from progressive alliances that focus on promoting relationship-based work and a focus on broader social justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:《新自由主义英国的饥饿、白人和宗教》,作者:玛蒂·鲍尔
经济政策加剧了不平等,减少了福利支付和权利,削减了服务。这些都是导致整个社会更高程度精神痛苦的因素,莫丝的研究表明,专业人士如何关注服务用户成为“负责任的消费者”,他们会管理自己的风险。在这两个过程中,一种探索健康的社会决定因素的更广泛的社会方法(Karban, 2016)失去了精神痛苦。由于进一步削减福利和采取专门针对残疾人的措施,紧缩政策加剧了这些趋势。本书的一个显著特征是,服务用户和CHMT工作人员的观点之间存在显著的重叠。这两个团体都承认,精神卫生服务正在复制制度化精神病学的一些缺陷。现代精神卫生工作已成为防御性个案工作和风险管理,重点是遵守药物治疗。莫丝的结论是,对这种方法的挑战不会来自根植于新自由主义政策议程的服务改革。这只能来自于专注于促进基于关系的工作和更广泛的社会正义的进步联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Critical Social Policy provides a forum for advocacy, analysis and debate on social policy issues. We publish critical perspectives which: ·acknowledge and reflect upon differences in political, economic, social and cultural power and upon the diversity of cultures and movements shaping social policy; ·re-think conventional approaches to securing rights, meeting needs and challenging inequalities and injustices; ·include perspectives, analyses and concerns of people and groups whose voices are unheard or underrepresented in policy-making; ·reflect lived experiences of users of existing benefits and services;
期刊最新文献
Distanciation as a technology of control in the UK hostile environment. Pregnant racialised migrants and the ubiquitous border: The hostile environment as a technology of stratified reproduction. Bordering social reproduction: The welfare/immigration regimes of Quebec and Ontario in Canada Diminishing returns of growth? Economic performance, needs satisfaction and ecological impacts of OECD welfare states A cure-all for energy poverty? Thinking critically about energy advice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1