Towards more inclusive qualitative research: the practice of interviewing neurominorities

J. Szulc
{"title":"Towards more inclusive qualitative research: the practice of interviewing neurominorities","authors":"J. Szulc","doi":"10.1080/10301763.2022.2148853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Management scholars increasingly focus their efforts on the development of neurodivergent human capital and the promotion of inclusive employment and decent work. However, it may be argued that existing research still suffers from the lack of a comprehensive appreciation of what neurominorities may find difficult in the research process or how they interpret what the researchers are doing. In the light of only fragmented advice about how qualitative research with neurominorities should be conducted, this short research note aims to promote effective and inclusive qualitative research that ensures that the specific needs of neurominorities are taken into account throughout the entire research pathway. Building on the existing literature and my own reflections, I call on qualitative management scholars to engage in research that is truly impactful at multiple levels by re-considering how they make impact on those who traditionally have less voice or power.","PeriodicalId":45265,"journal":{"name":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2022.2148853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Management scholars increasingly focus their efforts on the development of neurodivergent human capital and the promotion of inclusive employment and decent work. However, it may be argued that existing research still suffers from the lack of a comprehensive appreciation of what neurominorities may find difficult in the research process or how they interpret what the researchers are doing. In the light of only fragmented advice about how qualitative research with neurominorities should be conducted, this short research note aims to promote effective and inclusive qualitative research that ensures that the specific needs of neurominorities are taken into account throughout the entire research pathway. Building on the existing literature and my own reflections, I call on qualitative management scholars to engage in research that is truly impactful at multiple levels by re-considering how they make impact on those who traditionally have less voice or power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向更具包容性的定性研究:访谈神经肌肉的实践
摘要管理学学者越来越关注神经分化型人力资本的开发以及促进包容性就业和体面工作。然而,有人可能会说,现有的研究仍然缺乏对神经肌肉在研究过程中可能遇到的困难或他们如何解释研究人员正在做的事情的全面了解。鉴于只有关于如何进行神经肌肉的定性研究的零散建议,本简短的研究说明旨在促进有效和包容性的定性研究,确保在整个研究过程中考虑到神经肌肉的具体需求。在现有文献和我自己的反思的基础上,我呼吁定性管理学者通过重新考虑他们如何对那些传统上发言权或权力较小的人产生影响,参与在多个层面上真正有影响力的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Livelihoods, work, women and climate change: women’s voice in just transition India’s informal economy: contractual labour in the formal manufacturing sector Industrial relations as power, place and time: the case of Queensland coal mining The value of work for doctors in Pakistan: towards a framework for ensuring decent work Teacher workload and the organisation of work: a research agenda for a post-pandemic future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1