Thais Selau, Sílvia Cristina Marceliano Hallberg, Adriana Schütz, D. Bandeira
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions in Adaptive Behavior for Children and Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities","authors":"Thais Selau, Sílvia Cristina Marceliano Hallberg, Adriana Schütz, D. Bandeira","doi":"10.6000/2292-2598.2022.10.05.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intellectual disability (ID) represents limitations in intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior that originate before 22 years of age. Adaptive behavior is a set of conceptual, social, and practical skills that have been learned and are performed by people in their daily lives. Early intervention, followed by continuous and focused adaptive behavior, can increase the quality of life and improve ID presentation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate adaptive behavior interventions for children and adolescents with ID and to analyze their effectiveness. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement guidelines. The 20 identified studies vary in terms of participant characteristics and type and duration of interventions. We performed the meta-analysis by examining the differences in the standardized mean or mean differences. Heterogeneity was tested using the I² test. The meta-analysis results indicate a lack of general consensus in the field of ID studies regarding interventions for adaptive behavior. This does not imply that there are insufficient foundations for the construct or the interventions, just a lack of evidence and consensus for using a specific intervention protocol. In subgroup sensitivity analysis, ABA-based interventions showed significant improvement in the experimental group's adaptive behavior compared to the control group. The findings provide information for researchers and practitioners, highlighting areas that need future research and offering implications for practice.","PeriodicalId":37806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2022.10.05.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Intellectual disability (ID) represents limitations in intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior that originate before 22 years of age. Adaptive behavior is a set of conceptual, social, and practical skills that have been learned and are performed by people in their daily lives. Early intervention, followed by continuous and focused adaptive behavior, can increase the quality of life and improve ID presentation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate adaptive behavior interventions for children and adolescents with ID and to analyze their effectiveness. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement guidelines. The 20 identified studies vary in terms of participant characteristics and type and duration of interventions. We performed the meta-analysis by examining the differences in the standardized mean or mean differences. Heterogeneity was tested using the I² test. The meta-analysis results indicate a lack of general consensus in the field of ID studies regarding interventions for adaptive behavior. This does not imply that there are insufficient foundations for the construct or the interventions, just a lack of evidence and consensus for using a specific intervention protocol. In subgroup sensitivity analysis, ABA-based interventions showed significant improvement in the experimental group's adaptive behavior compared to the control group. The findings provide information for researchers and practitioners, highlighting areas that need future research and offering implications for practice.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to describe the research work on Intellectual Disability Diagnosis and Treatment in children and adults. It covers not just the technical aspects of the procedures in prenatal, newborn and postnatal screening, but also the impact which the process of testing and treatment has on individuals, parents, families and public-health in general. The journal seeks to publish, but is a not restricted to, Genetic Intellectual Disability Syndromes, using a range of approaches from medicine, psychiatry, psychology, pharmacy, biology, epidemiology, bioinformatics, biopharmaceutical to association and population studies as well as sociological, ethical, philosophical, legal and quality control issues with the ultimate goal of advancing the knowledge on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of the Intellectual Disabilities. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports and short communications(Letter article).