A study of UG2 pillar strength using a new pillar database

IF 0.9 4区 材料科学 Q3 Materials Science Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Pub Date : 2023-07-13 DOI:10.17159/2411-9717/2656/2023
T. Oates, D. Malan
{"title":"A study of UG2 pillar strength using a new pillar database","authors":"T. Oates, D. Malan","doi":"10.17159/2411-9717/2656/2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent experimental pillar extraction project at a UG2 bord-and-pillar mine presented a unique opportunity to compile a new pillar database. Currently, the South African hard rock bord-and-pillar mines are designed using the Hedley and Grant formula with a modified K-value. This empirically derived formula was developed for uranium mines in the Elliot Lake district of Canada. The use of this formula for the design of pillars in South Africa is questionable. Very few pillar failures have nevertheless been observed and its current calibrations for the various reef types are possibly too conservative. A new UG2 pillar database of 66 pillars, of which seven are classified as failed, was compiled by the authors. This enabled a revised 'first-order' calibration of the K-value for the Hedley and Grant formula. The new estimated value for the UG2 is K = 75 MPa. This gives a pillar strength that is more conservative than the PlatMine formula. This work should nevertheless be considered as only a preliminary calibration as the database was small. Further work is also required to determine whether the exponents in the formula for the width and height parameters are appropriate for UG2 pillars.","PeriodicalId":17492,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2656/2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recent experimental pillar extraction project at a UG2 bord-and-pillar mine presented a unique opportunity to compile a new pillar database. Currently, the South African hard rock bord-and-pillar mines are designed using the Hedley and Grant formula with a modified K-value. This empirically derived formula was developed for uranium mines in the Elliot Lake district of Canada. The use of this formula for the design of pillars in South Africa is questionable. Very few pillar failures have nevertheless been observed and its current calibrations for the various reef types are possibly too conservative. A new UG2 pillar database of 66 pillars, of which seven are classified as failed, was compiled by the authors. This enabled a revised 'first-order' calibration of the K-value for the Hedley and Grant formula. The new estimated value for the UG2 is K = 75 MPa. This gives a pillar strength that is more conservative than the PlatMine formula. This work should nevertheless be considered as only a preliminary calibration as the database was small. Further work is also required to determine whether the exponents in the formula for the width and height parameters are appropriate for UG2 pillars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用一个新的矿柱数据库研究UG2矿柱强度
最近在UG2边界和矿柱矿进行的矿柱提取实验项目为编制新的矿柱数据库提供了一个独特的机会。目前,南非硬岩边界和矿柱矿山采用Hedley和Grant公式设计,并修改了K值。这个经验推导公式是为加拿大埃利奥特湖区的铀矿开发的。在南非使用这一公式设计支柱是值得怀疑的。然而,很少观察到支柱失效,目前对各种珊瑚礁类型的校准可能过于保守。作者编制了一个由66个支柱组成的新的UG2支柱数据库,其中7个被归类为失败支柱。这使得能够对Hedley和Grant公式的K值进行修订的“一阶”校准。UG2的新估算值为K=75 MPa。这给出了比PlatMine公式更保守的支柱强度。然而,由于数据库规模较小,这项工作应被视为只是初步校准。还需要进一步的工作来确定宽度和高度参数公式中的指数是否适用于UG2支柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal serves as a medium for the publication of high quality scientific papers. This requires that the papers that are submitted for publication are properly and fairly refereed and edited. This process will maintain the high quality of the presentation of the paper and ensure that the technical content is in line with the accepted norms of scientific integrity.
期刊最新文献
A study of different grinding aids for low-energy cement clinker production The needle penetration index for estimating the physico-mechanical properties of pyroclastic rocks Energy efficiency in the South African mining sector: A case study at a coal mine in Mpumalanga Optimization of shape factor by the response surface method, and the effect on sphalerite flotation recovery Mechanical activation and physicochemical factors controlling pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical, and electrometallurgical processing of titanium ore: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1