On the Necessity of Referral to t he Category "Randomity" In the Process of Moral Assessment of Individual's Acts

IF 1.9 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Intelligenza Artificiale Pub Date : 2021-03-23 DOI:10.32370/IA_2021_03_05
Petr Makuhin
{"title":"On the Necessity of Referral to t he Category \"Randomity\" In the Process of Moral Assessment of Individual's Acts","authors":"Petr Makuhin","doi":"10.32370/IA_2021_03_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, firstly through the analysis of the history of ethical teachings, the basic requirements for the procedure of moral assessment, for its subject (the legitimacy of this assessment) and the object (taking into account the consequences of the act, their motives, as well as the ratio of the goal and the means used to achieve it) are identified. Consideration of a particular deed taking into account all these aspects, it would seem, allows us to make its moral assessment objective, impartial, fair. However, secondly (and most importantly!), we substantiate the thesis that if this consideration is not supplemented with the category of randomity (moreover, interpreted as aclinamen), then the resulting assessment will itself be morally problematic, giving rise to moral complacency and depriving us the opportunity to help a morally stumbled person.","PeriodicalId":42055,"journal":{"name":"Intelligenza Artificiale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligenza Artificiale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32370/IA_2021_03_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article, firstly through the analysis of the history of ethical teachings, the basic requirements for the procedure of moral assessment, for its subject (the legitimacy of this assessment) and the object (taking into account the consequences of the act, their motives, as well as the ratio of the goal and the means used to achieve it) are identified. Consideration of a particular deed taking into account all these aspects, it would seem, allows us to make its moral assessment objective, impartial, fair. However, secondly (and most importantly!), we substantiate the thesis that if this consideration is not supplemented with the category of randomity (moreover, interpreted as aclinamen), then the resulting assessment will itself be morally problematic, giving rise to moral complacency and depriving us the opportunity to help a morally stumbled person.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论个人行为道德评价过程中引入“随机性”范畴的必要性
本文首先通过对道德教育历史的分析,确定了道德评估程序的基本要求,对道德评估的主体(评估的合法性)和对象(考虑行为的后果、动机以及目标的比例和实现目标的手段)。考虑到所有这些方面,对某一特定行为的考虑似乎使我们能够使其道德评估客观、公正、公平。然而,第二(也是最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligenza Artificiale
Intelligenza Artificiale COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Special Issue NL4AI 2022: Workshop on natural language for artificial intelligence User-centric item characteristics for personalized multimedia systems: A systematic review Combining human intelligence and machine learning for fact-checking: Towards a hybrid human-in-the-loop framework A framework for safe decision making: A convex duality approach Grounding End-to-End Pre-trained architectures for Semantic Role Labeling in multiple languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1