Self-selection from higher education: a meta-review of resources for academic decision-making of mainstream and underrepresented students

Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/13596748.2022.2076057
Jana Vietze, Sanne G. A. van Herpen, Aike S. Dias-Broens, S. Severiens, M. Meeuwisse
{"title":"Self-selection from higher education: a meta-review of resources for academic decision-making of mainstream and underrepresented students","authors":"Jana Vietze, Sanne G. A. van Herpen, Aike S. Dias-Broens, S. Severiens, M. Meeuwisse","doi":"10.1080/13596748.2022.2076057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Self-selection refers to the decision of qualified students to not pursue their highest possible educational degree, including higher education. In this systematic meta-review, we used the conceptual framework of college choice to identify resources or mechanisms for students’ self-selection from higher education in international reviews and meta-analyses. In addition, we investigate whether underrepresented student groups (i.e., first-generation and cultural minority) experience unique resources and mechanisms for self-selection. Our narrative synthesis of international reviews and meta-analyses indicated that self-selection is related to financial, informational, social, aspirational resources in all contextual layers (i.e. individual habitus, school and community, higher education, socio-political context) of the conceptual framework of college choice. Whereas the family can help prevent self-selection by providing all four types of resources, school and higher education institutions can provide important information and social support through counselling and mentoring activities. For underrepresented groups, vertical and horizontal transmissions of social capital and experienced personal fit with the higher education environment may be of special importance for preventing self-selection. We conclude by discussing the potential of self-selection as concept for future interventions and research on widening access to higher education.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2022.2076057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Self-selection refers to the decision of qualified students to not pursue their highest possible educational degree, including higher education. In this systematic meta-review, we used the conceptual framework of college choice to identify resources or mechanisms for students’ self-selection from higher education in international reviews and meta-analyses. In addition, we investigate whether underrepresented student groups (i.e., first-generation and cultural minority) experience unique resources and mechanisms for self-selection. Our narrative synthesis of international reviews and meta-analyses indicated that self-selection is related to financial, informational, social, aspirational resources in all contextual layers (i.e. individual habitus, school and community, higher education, socio-political context) of the conceptual framework of college choice. Whereas the family can help prevent self-selection by providing all four types of resources, school and higher education institutions can provide important information and social support through counselling and mentoring activities. For underrepresented groups, vertical and horizontal transmissions of social capital and experienced personal fit with the higher education environment may be of special importance for preventing self-selection. We conclude by discussing the potential of self-selection as concept for future interventions and research on widening access to higher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
高等教育的自我选择:主流学生和代表性不足学生学术决策资源的元回顾
自我选择是指合格学生决定不追求最高学历,包括高等教育。在这篇系统的元综述中,我们使用大学选择的概念框架,在国际综述和元分析中确定了学生从高等教育中自我选择的资源或机制。此外,我们还调查了代表性不足的学生群体(即第一代和文化少数群体)是否经历了独特的自我选择资源和机制。我们对国际评论和荟萃分析的叙述性综合表明,自我选择与大学选择概念框架的所有背景层(即个人习惯、学校和社区、高等教育、社会政治背景)中的财务、信息、社会和抱负资源有关。尽管家庭可以通过提供所有四种资源来帮助防止自我选择,但学校和高等教育机构可以通过咨询和辅导活动提供重要信息和社会支持。对于代表性不足的群体来说,社会资本的纵向和横向传播以及与高等教育环境的个人适应可能对防止自我选择具有特别重要的意义。最后,我们讨论了自我选择作为未来干预措施和扩大高等教育机会研究概念的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1