Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus

Shereen Salman, Mervat Mourad, Rafek ElGhazawy, Rafaat Rihan
{"title":"Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus","authors":"Shereen Salman, Mervat Mourad, Rafek ElGhazawy, Rafaat Rihan","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_43_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Phacoemulsification acoenergy and shortening the phacotime can decrease this risk. Aim The aim of this work is to compare the safety and the efficiency of phacoemulsification using conventional and torsional ultrasound modalities for hard nucleus cataracts. Settings and design This was a prospective randomized interventional study. Patients and methods A total of 30 eyes of 29 patients having hard nuclear cataract (grades IV and V) were divided into two groups. Group A included 15 eyes whose cataract was operated on by conventional phacoemulsification using the Infiniti machine. Group B included 15 eyes whose cataract was operated on by torsional phacoemulsification using the OZil technology of the Infiniti machine. Intraoperative ultrasound time and cumulative dissipated energy were recorded. Postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured at days 1, 7, and 30, and specular microscopy was done at 1 month. Statistical analysis The collected data were coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results The mean ultrasound time and cumulative dissipated energy and the amount of irrigating fluid were significantly higher in group A. There was a highly significant decrease in endothelial cell count (ECC) in both groups. ECC was significantly lower in the conventional group than in the torsional group at 1 month postoperatively. CCT in both groups was significantly increased at day 1 and then decreased at 1 week and 1 month but was still significantly higher than the preoperative level. CCT became higher in the conventional group than in the torsional group at all follow-up times, but this was significant only at day 1 and week 1 and not significant at 1 month. Conclusion Both ultrasound modalities can be used in hard nucleus phacoemulsification. However, the torsional ultrasound proved to be safer. The choice between these technologies is of particular importance when operating eyes with low ECC.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":"114 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_43_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Phacoemulsification acoenergy and shortening the phacotime can decrease this risk. Aim The aim of this work is to compare the safety and the efficiency of phacoemulsification using conventional and torsional ultrasound modalities for hard nucleus cataracts. Settings and design This was a prospective randomized interventional study. Patients and methods A total of 30 eyes of 29 patients having hard nuclear cataract (grades IV and V) were divided into two groups. Group A included 15 eyes whose cataract was operated on by conventional phacoemulsification using the Infiniti machine. Group B included 15 eyes whose cataract was operated on by torsional phacoemulsification using the OZil technology of the Infiniti machine. Intraoperative ultrasound time and cumulative dissipated energy were recorded. Postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured at days 1, 7, and 30, and specular microscopy was done at 1 month. Statistical analysis The collected data were coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results The mean ultrasound time and cumulative dissipated energy and the amount of irrigating fluid were significantly higher in group A. There was a highly significant decrease in endothelial cell count (ECC) in both groups. ECC was significantly lower in the conventional group than in the torsional group at 1 month postoperatively. CCT in both groups was significantly increased at day 1 and then decreased at 1 week and 1 month but was still significantly higher than the preoperative level. CCT became higher in the conventional group than in the torsional group at all follow-up times, but this was significant only at day 1 and week 1 and not significant at 1 month. Conclusion Both ultrasound modalities can be used in hard nucleus phacoemulsification. However, the torsional ultrasound proved to be safer. The choice between these technologies is of particular importance when operating eyes with low ECC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规与扭转超声乳化术治疗硬核的比较研究
背景:超声乳化术能减少能量和缩短超声时间可以降低这种风险。目的比较常规超声和扭转超声对硬核白内障超声乳化术的安全性和有效性。这是一项前瞻性随机干预性研究。患者与方法将29例硬核性白内障(IV级、V级)患者30只眼分为两组。A组15只眼采用Infiniti机器行常规超声乳化白内障手术。B组15眼采用Infiniti机器的OZil技术行扭转超声乳化白内障手术。记录术中超声时间和累计耗散能量。术后第1天、第7天和第30天测量角膜中央厚度(CCT),第1个月进行镜面显微镜检查。对收集到的数据进行编码、制表和统计分析。结果a组平均超声时间、累积耗散能和灌洗液量均显著高于a组,内皮细胞计数(ECC)均显著降低。术后1个月,常规组的ECC明显低于扭转组。两组患者CCT均在第1天显著升高,第1周和第1个月显著降低,但仍显著高于术前水平。在所有随访时间,常规组的CCT均高于扭转组,但这仅在第1天和第1周显著,1个月时不显著。结论两种超声方式均可用于硬核超声乳化术。然而,扭转超声被证明是更安全的。当操作低ECC的眼睛时,这些技术之间的选择尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Difference between skin incision size at the start and at the end of external dacryocystorhinostomy Achondroplasia with macular coloboma and cone-rod dystrophy: a case report A comparison between 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination: brand name drug to its generic counterpart regarding efficacy and side effects Incidence of cataract and glaucoma in children with nephrotic syndrome undergoing steroid treatment Clinical study of functional visual recovery following phacoemulsification with IOL implantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1