Shared Accountability: How One School Is Reforming a Writing Curriculum through Sustained Engaged Scholarship

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Research and Instruction Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1080/19388071.2022.2138646
Mellinee Lesley, A. Higgins, Whitney Beach, Elizabeth Stewart, J. Keene
{"title":"Shared Accountability: How One School Is Reforming a Writing Curriculum through Sustained Engaged Scholarship","authors":"Mellinee Lesley, A. Higgins, Whitney Beach, Elizabeth Stewart, J. Keene","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2022.2138646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many high schools in the United States are contending with modest student writing achievement and looking for ways to enhance teachers’ writing instruction. This is especially the case for schools deemed to be “underperforming” and struggling to reform writing pedagogy against an accumulation of teacher and leadership turnover, limited resources, minimal teacher preparation in writing pedagogy, and a persistent gap in student literacy development. Realizing optimal learning conditions cannot be addressed by a single entity, we conducted an engaged scholarship study focused on writing reform in a high school facing these very issues. Through a school-university partnership carried out across three years’ time, we witnessed the transformation of teachers as they participated in sustained professional development, collaboration, and examination of their practices. In the present study, we turned the lens on ourselves to examine the process of conducting engaged scholarship. We found enacting collective efficacy through shared research and knowledge with a literacy coach and ninth and tenth grade English teachers brought about incremental and sustained writing reform and reframed our views of researcher roles and responsibilities.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"62 1","pages":"280 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2138646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many high schools in the United States are contending with modest student writing achievement and looking for ways to enhance teachers’ writing instruction. This is especially the case for schools deemed to be “underperforming” and struggling to reform writing pedagogy against an accumulation of teacher and leadership turnover, limited resources, minimal teacher preparation in writing pedagogy, and a persistent gap in student literacy development. Realizing optimal learning conditions cannot be addressed by a single entity, we conducted an engaged scholarship study focused on writing reform in a high school facing these very issues. Through a school-university partnership carried out across three years’ time, we witnessed the transformation of teachers as they participated in sustained professional development, collaboration, and examination of their practices. In the present study, we turned the lens on ourselves to examine the process of conducting engaged scholarship. We found enacting collective efficacy through shared research and knowledge with a literacy coach and ninth and tenth grade English teachers brought about incremental and sustained writing reform and reframed our views of researcher roles and responsibilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同责任:一所学校如何通过持续参与奖学金改革写作课程
摘要:美国许多高中都在努力争取学生的写作成绩,并寻求加强教师写作教学的方法。对于那些被认为“表现不佳”的学校来说尤其如此,因为教师和领导层的更替不断积累,资源有限,教师在写作教学法方面的准备最少,学生识字能力发展存在持续差距,这些学校正在努力改革写作教学法。意识到最佳的学习条件不能由一个单一的实体来解决,我们进行了一项参与式的奖学金研究,重点是在一所面临这些问题的高中进行写作改革。通过三年的学校-大学合作,我们见证了教师在参与持续的专业发展、合作和实践审查时的转变。在本研究中,我们将镜头转向自己,以考察进行参与式学术的过程。我们发现,通过与识字教练以及九年级和十年级英语教师共享研究和知识,实现集体效能,带来了渐进和持续的写作改革,并重新定义了我们对研究人员角色和责任的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Adolescent Emergent Readers in Government Schools: An Exploration of Multimodal Texts as Pathways to Comprehension Novice Teachers’ Knowledge of Racial Literacies Effect of Dramatic Storytelling on Emergent Literacy in EFL: Evidence from the UAE Kindergartens Reexamining the Dolch Basic Sight Word List: Contemporary Considerations for Culturally Sustaining Approaches to Assess Sight Word Development A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Synchronous Paired Oral Reading Techniques in Elementary Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1