Working with Aula: How teachers navigate privacy uncertainties

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Information Society Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1080/01972243.2023.2210543
R. Jørgensen, Bjarki Valtysson, Jesper Pagh
{"title":"Working with Aula: How teachers navigate privacy uncertainties","authors":"R. Jørgensen, Bjarki Valtysson, Jesper Pagh","doi":"10.1080/01972243.2023.2210543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aula is a mandatory public school platform in Denmark with more than two million users. The idea behind Aula was to provide a shared space for communication and cooperation around children, both within the school/municipality setting and between teachers and parents, while adhering to the requirements of EU’s General Data Protection Regulation. In this article we examine the incorporation of Aula in the daily practices of teachers, especially as they relate to children’s privacy and data protection. Based on qualitative interviews with nine teachers and four experts, and drawing on practice theory, platform theory, and theories on children’s privacy, we find that Aula – despite the intentions behind it – fails to support the complex nature of teachers’ work practices and, therefore, to provide a solid data protection framework for the children. As such, the teachers mainly view the platform as being conducive to their non-sensitive communication with parents and deploy a range of other digital tools to support, for instance, cooperation with colleagues. Consequently, gaps in children’s privacy and data protection arise.","PeriodicalId":51481,"journal":{"name":"Information Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2023.2210543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Aula is a mandatory public school platform in Denmark with more than two million users. The idea behind Aula was to provide a shared space for communication and cooperation around children, both within the school/municipality setting and between teachers and parents, while adhering to the requirements of EU’s General Data Protection Regulation. In this article we examine the incorporation of Aula in the daily practices of teachers, especially as they relate to children’s privacy and data protection. Based on qualitative interviews with nine teachers and four experts, and drawing on practice theory, platform theory, and theories on children’s privacy, we find that Aula – despite the intentions behind it – fails to support the complex nature of teachers’ work practices and, therefore, to provide a solid data protection framework for the children. As such, the teachers mainly view the platform as being conducive to their non-sensitive communication with parents and deploy a range of other digital tools to support, for instance, cooperation with colleagues. Consequently, gaps in children’s privacy and data protection arise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与Aula合作:教师如何应对隐私的不确定性
Aula是丹麦的一个强制性公立学校平台,拥有200多万用户。Aula背后的想法是为孩子们提供一个共享的交流和合作空间,无论是在学校/市政环境中,还是在老师和家长之间,同时遵守欧盟通用数据保护条例的要求。在本文中,我们研究了Aula在教师日常实践中的应用,特别是在儿童隐私和数据保护方面。通过对9位教师和4位专家的定性访谈,并借鉴实践理论、平台理论和儿童隐私理论,我们发现,尽管Aula的初衷是好的,但它无法支持教师工作实践的复杂性,因此无法为儿童提供坚实的数据保护框架。因此,教师主要认为该平台有助于他们与家长进行非敏感的沟通,并部署了一系列其他数字工具来支持,例如与同事的合作。因此,出现了儿童隐私和数据保护方面的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Information Society is a multidisciplinary journal intended to answer questions about the Information Age. It provides a forum for thoughtful commentary and discussion of significant topics in the world of information, such as transborder data flow, regulatory issues, the impact of the information industry, information as a determinant of public and private organizational performance, and information and the sovereignty of the public and private organizational performance, and information and the sovereignty of the public. Its papers analyze information policy issues affecting society. Because of the journal"s international perspective, it will have worldwide appeal to scientists and policymakers in government, education, and industry.
期刊最新文献
Intellectual property rights and control in the digital economy: Examining the expansion of M-Pesa Finding meaning in crowdwork: An analysis of algorithmic management, work characteristics, and meaningfulness Business as usual? How gamification transforms internal party democracy Information infrastructures and historical research: A framework useful for professional and amateur historians The effects of algorithmic content selection on user engagement with news on Twitter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1