Do Job Attitudes Mediate the Relationships Between Triarchic Psychopathy Domains and Organizational Citizenship Behavior?

Q4 Psychology Roczniki Psychologiczne Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.18290/rpsych2023.0010
Elżbieta Sanecka
{"title":"Do Job Attitudes Mediate the Relationships Between Triarchic Psychopathy Domains and Organizational Citizenship Behavior?","authors":"Elżbieta Sanecka","doi":"10.18290/rpsych2023.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigated how triarchic psychopathy domains are related to self-rated organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and whether job attitudes, such as job satisfaction and affective commitment, mediate these relationships. Results from a sample of 434 employees indicated that OCB was positively correlated with boldness, negatively with meanness, and uncorrelated with disinhibition. Structural equation modeling (SEM) demonstrated that job satisfaction and affective commitment were positively predicted by boldness and negatively by meanness. In addition, disinhibition positively predicted affective commitment. With regard to job attitudes–OCB associations, only affective commitment significantly positively predicted OCB, suggesting its mediating role in the relationships between psychopathy dimensions and OCB. These findings contribute to the literature on the underpinnings of behavioral manifestations of psychopathy in the organizational context by proposing the potential attitudinal mechanism underlying the relationships between triarchic psychopathy domains and OCB.","PeriodicalId":38005,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Psychologiczne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Psychologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych2023.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated how triarchic psychopathy domains are related to self-rated organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and whether job attitudes, such as job satisfaction and affective commitment, mediate these relationships. Results from a sample of 434 employees indicated that OCB was positively correlated with boldness, negatively with meanness, and uncorrelated with disinhibition. Structural equation modeling (SEM) demonstrated that job satisfaction and affective commitment were positively predicted by boldness and negatively by meanness. In addition, disinhibition positively predicted affective commitment. With regard to job attitudes–OCB associations, only affective commitment significantly positively predicted OCB, suggesting its mediating role in the relationships between psychopathy dimensions and OCB. These findings contribute to the literature on the underpinnings of behavioral manifestations of psychopathy in the organizational context by proposing the potential attitudinal mechanism underlying the relationships between triarchic psychopathy domains and OCB.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作态度是否中介三重型精神病态域与组织公民行为的关系?
本研究探讨了三型精神病态域与自评组织公民行为(OCB)的关系,以及工作态度(如工作满意度和情感承诺)是否在这些关系中起中介作用。对434名员工的调查结果表明,组织公民行为与大胆正相关,与卑鄙负相关,与去抑制不相关。结构方程模型(SEM)显示,大胆对工作满意度和情感承诺有正向预测作用,吝啬对工作满意度和情感承诺有负向预测作用。此外,去抑制正向预测情感承诺。在工作态度与组织行为的关系中,只有情感承诺显著正向预测组织行为,表明其在精神病态维度与组织行为的关系中起中介作用。这些发现通过提出潜在的态度机制,为组织背景下的精神病态行为表现提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Roczniki Psychologiczne
Roczniki Psychologiczne Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Roczniki Psychologiczne / Annals of Psychology, the continuation of Annals of Philosophy: Psychology, is an academic journal edited by The Scientific Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin [Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL]. It aims to present up-to-date and original empirical results and influential theoretical considerations in various areas of psychology as well as to promote new and creative ideas in research and psychological methods. The Journal accepts contributions of three kinds: 1) original peer reviewed articles on both empirical and conceptual topics, 2) short communications, and 3) polemics, which consist of a focus article followed by peer commentaries and a response by the author of the focus article.
期刊最新文献
Polish Adaptation and Validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children (PSWQ-C): Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity Item Analysis of Sociocultural Influences in Verbal Ability Testing Using the Woodcock-Johnson II COG Conflict and Facilitation Between Work and Family Roles and Goal Realization in Entrepreneurs Emotional Experiences and Their Connection With Coping Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Gender Differences Do Narcissists Play Solo? Differences in Self-Efficacy and Narcissism Among Band and Solo Musicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1