Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis on Theatres’ Efficiency – Czech and Polish Comparative Case Studies

IF 0.3 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Croatian and Comparative Public Administration Pub Date : 2021-10-27 DOI:10.31297/hkju.21.3.5
Jiří Bečica, R. Vavrek, Małgorzata Gałecka, Katarzyna Smolny
{"title":"Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis on Theatres’ Efficiency – Czech and Polish Comparative Case Studies","authors":"Jiří Bečica, R. Vavrek, Małgorzata Gałecka, Katarzyna Smolny","doi":"10.31297/hkju.21.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Institutions (theatres) evaluated in this paper are mediators of an unrepeatable interpretive art and they need funds from public resources of different government levels to ensure their activities. The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the efficiency of theatre management of 93 evaluated public theatres in the Czech Republic and Poland through 11 indicators. The evaluated weights of chosen indicators were determined by the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), in combination with the chosen objective method for determining the importance of indicators. From the results it is evident that big multi-genre theatres producing more genres of interpretive art (drama, opera, ballet, musical) with a bigger number of employees had the worst results\nin both states.","PeriodicalId":42223,"journal":{"name":"Croatian and Comparative Public Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian and Comparative Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.21.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Institutions (theatres) evaluated in this paper are mediators of an unrepeatable interpretive art and they need funds from public resources of different government levels to ensure their activities. The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the efficiency of theatre management of 93 evaluated public theatres in the Czech Republic and Poland through 11 indicators. The evaluated weights of chosen indicators were determined by the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), in combination with the chosen objective method for determining the importance of indicators. From the results it is evident that big multi-genre theatres producing more genres of interpretive art (drama, opera, ballet, musical) with a bigger number of employees had the worst results in both states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多准则分析在剧院效率分析中的应用——捷克和波兰的比较案例研究
本文评估的机构(剧院)是一种不可复制的解释艺术的中介,它们需要来自不同政府级别的公共资源的资金来确保其活动。本文的目的是通过11项指标评估捷克共和国和波兰93家经评估的公共剧院的剧院管理效率。所选指标的评估权重是通过与理想解相似的偏好顺序技术(TOPSIS),结合所选的确定指标重要性的客观方法来确定的。从结果中可以明显看出,在这两个州,生产更多类型解释艺术(戏剧、歌剧、芭蕾舞、音乐剧)、员工人数更多的大型多类型剧院的结果最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Integration of Effectiveness and Efficiency Indicators of State Support for Projects and Programmes for the Development of Higher Education in Russia Istraživanje korištenja usluga sustava e-Građani kod mladih – primjer grada Zadra Sudjelovanje u troškovima zdravstvene zaštite iz obveznog zdravstvenog osiguranja Preparation for Old Age and Ageing in the Time of the First Czechoslovak Republic Public and Private Law Aspects of Breach of the Concession Contract in Slovenian Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1