Should We Narrow the Scope of "Racism" to Accommodate White Sensitivities?

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2019-07-19 DOI:10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.7.2.0223

Michael O. Hardimon

引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract:This article critically examines the proposal that the word "racism" should be restricted to the most egregious of racial ills. It argues that the costs of restricting the scope of the term in this way are too great and that the proposal gives too much weight to white sensitivities.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

我们是否应该缩小“种族主义”的范围以适应白人的敏感性?

摘要:本文批判性地审视了“种族主义”一词应限于最严重的种族弊病的提议。它认为，以这种方式限制该术语范围的代价太大，而且该提案过于重视白人的敏感性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.