Further evidence for the efficacy of an evidence-based, small group, literacy intervention program for young struggling readers

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19404158.2017.1287102
K. Wheldall, Robyn Wheldall, Alison Madelaine, Meree Reynolds, Sarah Arakelian
{"title":"Further evidence for the efficacy of an evidence-based, small group, literacy intervention program for young struggling readers","authors":"K. Wheldall, Robyn Wheldall, Alison Madelaine, Meree Reynolds, Sarah Arakelian","doi":"10.1080/19404158.2017.1287102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An earlier series of pilot studies and small-scale experimental studies had previously provided some evidence for the efficacy of a small group early literacy intervention program for young struggling readers. The present paper provides further evidence for efficacy based on a much larger sample of young, socially disadvantaged, at-risk readers. The participants comprised 14 successive intakes of Year 1 and Year 2 students into small group remedial literacy intervention programs hosted by two charitably run tutorial centres. In each semester, over the years 2005–2011, eight students (on average) attended each centre for one hour, for four days per week, for 15 weeks. Pre- and post-test assessment data on eight measures of early literacy performance were available on up to 194 students who completed the program. Substantial and statistically significant gains were evident on all literacy measures with large effect sizes. These results provide further evidence for the efficacy of the small group literacy intervention program.","PeriodicalId":44419,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","volume":"22 1","pages":"13 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19404158.2017.1287102","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2017.1287102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract An earlier series of pilot studies and small-scale experimental studies had previously provided some evidence for the efficacy of a small group early literacy intervention program for young struggling readers. The present paper provides further evidence for efficacy based on a much larger sample of young, socially disadvantaged, at-risk readers. The participants comprised 14 successive intakes of Year 1 and Year 2 students into small group remedial literacy intervention programs hosted by two charitably run tutorial centres. In each semester, over the years 2005–2011, eight students (on average) attended each centre for one hour, for four days per week, for 15 weeks. Pre- and post-test assessment data on eight measures of early literacy performance were available on up to 194 students who completed the program. Substantial and statistically significant gains were evident on all literacy measures with large effect sizes. These results provide further evidence for the efficacy of the small group literacy intervention program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这进一步证明了一个以证据为基础的小群体识字干预计划对年轻的困难读者的有效性
早前的一系列试点研究和小规模实验研究已经为小群体早期读写干预计划的有效性提供了一些证据。本论文基于一个更大的年轻的、社会弱势的、有风险的读者样本,为有效性提供了进一步的证据。参与者包括14名一年级和二年级的学生,他们连续参加了由两个慈善辅导中心主办的小组补习识字干预计划。在2005年至2011年期间,每个学期有8名学生(平均)在每个中心学习一小时,每周四天,为期15周。有多达194名学生完成了这个项目,他们在测试前和测试后对早期读写能力的八项指标进行了评估。在所有具有大效应量的扫盲措施中,明显的和统计上显著的收益。这些结果为小组扫盲干预计划的有效性提供了进一步的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Build it and they will come: responses to the provision of online science of language and reading professional learning “It is more than the average parent goes through”: using the experiences of Australian parents of dyslexic children to draw a distinction between advocacy and allyship The impact of an online training program on pre-service teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about dyslexia An implementation case study for the Response to Intervention (RTI) approach for oral language and reading instruction in the early years of primary school A Linguistic Approach to the Study of Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1