Knowledge, acceptability and utilization of epidural analgesia in antenatal clinic attendees at UNIOSUN Teaching Hospital (UTH), Osogbo, Osun State

S. Bola-Oyebamiji, R. Azeez, E. Farinloye, E. O. Folami
{"title":"Knowledge, acceptability and utilization of epidural analgesia in antenatal clinic attendees at UNIOSUN Teaching Hospital (UTH), Osogbo, Osun State","authors":"S. Bola-Oyebamiji, R. Azeez, E. Farinloye, E. O. Folami","doi":"10.4314/rejhs.v11i1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Objective: Labour pain is perceived as the most harrowing and agonizing event of a woman's life. Efforts at reducing the pain and making  the event less stressful have predated modern obstetric practice. Epidural analgesia has provided effective pain relief in labour for over three decades.  Delivery with epidural analgesia is routine for willing parturients in the developing world, however ignorance, cost as well as lack of qualified personnel  has made this to be out of reach of the average Nigerian mother. The aim of this study was to assess level of awareness, acceptability, previous utilization  and willingness to utilize epidural analgesia in labour following health education. \nSubjects/Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the antenatal clinic of UTH, Osogbo. Health education on events of labour and methods  of analgesia available was provided to all antenatal clinic attendees between September 2021and March 2022, following which a semi–structured  purpose designed, and self- administered questionnaire was administered to 415 of these women who consented to participate in this study. \nResults: The mean age of the respondents was 32.57± 4.42 years and mean parity of 1.73± 0.96. 70.8% reported that labour pain was severe. 41.7% were  aware of epidural analgesia before the health talk. 3.6% of our subjects had utilized epidural in their last confinement. However, only 47.7% expressed a  wish to utilize epidural analgesia in labour. \nConclusion: Awareness of epidural analgesia in study population was passable at 40% however willingness to utilize it was less than average despite  health talk and reassurance by their attending obstetric team. ","PeriodicalId":29646,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rejhs.v11i1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective: Labour pain is perceived as the most harrowing and agonizing event of a woman's life. Efforts at reducing the pain and making  the event less stressful have predated modern obstetric practice. Epidural analgesia has provided effective pain relief in labour for over three decades.  Delivery with epidural analgesia is routine for willing parturients in the developing world, however ignorance, cost as well as lack of qualified personnel  has made this to be out of reach of the average Nigerian mother. The aim of this study was to assess level of awareness, acceptability, previous utilization  and willingness to utilize epidural analgesia in labour following health education. Subjects/Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the antenatal clinic of UTH, Osogbo. Health education on events of labour and methods  of analgesia available was provided to all antenatal clinic attendees between September 2021and March 2022, following which a semi–structured  purpose designed, and self- administered questionnaire was administered to 415 of these women who consented to participate in this study. Results: The mean age of the respondents was 32.57± 4.42 years and mean parity of 1.73± 0.96. 70.8% reported that labour pain was severe. 41.7% were  aware of epidural analgesia before the health talk. 3.6% of our subjects had utilized epidural in their last confinement. However, only 47.7% expressed a  wish to utilize epidural analgesia in labour. Conclusion: Awareness of epidural analgesia in study population was passable at 40% however willingness to utilize it was less than average despite  health talk and reassurance by their attending obstetric team. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥松州奥索博市UNIOSUN教学医院产前门诊人员对硬膜外镇痛的知识、可接受性和使用情况
背景/目的:分娩疼痛被认为是女性一生中最痛苦的事件。减少疼痛和减轻活动压力的努力早于现代产科实践。硬膜外镇痛已经为分娩提供了超过三十年的有效镇痛。在发展中国家,硬膜外镇痛分娩对有意愿的产妇来说是家常便饭,但由于无知、成本高昂以及缺乏合格人员,尼日利亚普通母亲无法做到这一点。本研究的目的是评估健康教育后分娩中硬膜外镇痛的意识、可接受性、既往使用情况和意愿。受试者/方法:这项横断面研究在奥索博UTH的产前诊所进行。在2021年9月至2022年3月期间,向所有产前诊所参与者提供了关于分娩事件和可用镇痛方法的健康教育,随后对415名同意参与本研究的女性进行了半结构化、目的设计和自我管理的问卷调查。结果:调查对象的平均年龄为32.57±4.42岁,平均生育率为1.73±0.96。70.8%报告分娩疼痛严重。41.7%的患者在健康讲座前有硬膜外镇痛意识。3.6%的受试者在最后一次分娩时使用了硬膜外麻醉。然而,只有47.7%的人表示希望在分娩中使用硬膜外镇痛。结论:研究人群对硬膜外镇痛的认识可以达到40%,但尽管产科主治团队进行了健康谈话和保证,但使用硬膜外麻醉的意愿低于平均水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric and gynaecological procedures: Acomparative study between two regimens of antibiotics A retrospective assessment of rifampicin resistance in paediatric tuberculosis in a tertiary hospital in south west Nigeria Obesity and hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus outpatients on insulin therapy in Nigeria–data from the multicentre evaluation of type 2 diabetes mellitus outpatients patients on insulin therapy (METOIN) study Exploring atypical manifestations of Mpox: Anarrative review Correlation between Hearing Thresholds and Habitual use of Headphones/Earphones among Students of Tertiary Institutions in Northwestern Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1