Personality diversity in the workplace: A systematic literature review on introversion

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15555240.2023.2192504
Juliet Herbert, L. Ferri, B. Hernández, Isaias Zamarripa, Kimberly Hofer, M. Fazeli, Iryna Shnitsar, Kald Abdallah
{"title":"Personality diversity in the workplace: A systematic literature review on introversion","authors":"Juliet Herbert, L. Ferri, B. Hernández, Isaias Zamarripa, Kimberly Hofer, M. Fazeli, Iryna Shnitsar, Kald Abdallah","doi":"10.1080/15555240.2023.2192504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Up to half of the population have introverted personalities. Workplace diversity can lead to increased productivity, creativity and problem-solving. Understanding introversion in relation to workplace performance and creativity and how to encourage inclusion of introverts would benefit employers and employees. We describe the evidence defining and evaluating introversion, prevalence of introversion across groups, and strategies for promoting workplace inclusion of introverts. We searched MEDLINE®, Embase, and PsycINFO up to February 11, 2021. Of 2,724 records, 21 studies were included. Introversion definitions were generally negative and dated. Robust prevalence data were unavailable, and no studies aimed to test strategies for promoting workplace inclusion of introversion. Nevertheless, literature suggests that employees who identify with modern definitions of introversion may benefit from individualized workplace strategies such as flexible working environments, work/home-life boundaries, varied team composition, provision of social support, and relaxation training. Further empirical studies in the industrial setting with robust designs using modernized personality definitions are warranted to support the development of effective strategies to increase inclusion of different personalities in the workplace.","PeriodicalId":45287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health","volume":"38 1","pages":"165 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2023.2192504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Up to half of the population have introverted personalities. Workplace diversity can lead to increased productivity, creativity and problem-solving. Understanding introversion in relation to workplace performance and creativity and how to encourage inclusion of introverts would benefit employers and employees. We describe the evidence defining and evaluating introversion, prevalence of introversion across groups, and strategies for promoting workplace inclusion of introverts. We searched MEDLINE®, Embase, and PsycINFO up to February 11, 2021. Of 2,724 records, 21 studies were included. Introversion definitions were generally negative and dated. Robust prevalence data were unavailable, and no studies aimed to test strategies for promoting workplace inclusion of introversion. Nevertheless, literature suggests that employees who identify with modern definitions of introversion may benefit from individualized workplace strategies such as flexible working environments, work/home-life boundaries, varied team composition, provision of social support, and relaxation training. Further empirical studies in the industrial setting with robust designs using modernized personality definitions are warranted to support the development of effective strategies to increase inclusion of different personalities in the workplace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职场人格多样性:关于内向性的系统文献综述
多达一半的人性格内向。工作场所的多样性可以提高生产力、创造力和解决问题的能力。了解内向与工作场所绩效和创造力的关系,以及如何鼓励包容内向的人,将使雇主和员工受益。我们描述了对内向定义和评估的证据,对内向在群体中的流行程度,以及促进工作场所包容内向者的策略。我们检索了截至2021年2月11日的MEDLINE®、Embase和PsycINFO。在2724份记录中,包括了21项研究。内向的定义通常是消极的和过时的。没有可靠的流行数据,也没有研究旨在测试促进职场包容内向的策略。然而,文献表明,认同现代内向定义的员工可能会受益于个性化的工作场所策略,如灵活的工作环境、工作/家庭生活界限、多样化的团队组成、提供社会支持和放松训练。有必要在工业环境中进行进一步的实证研究,采用现代人格定义的稳健设计,以支持制定有效的策略,以增加工作场所对不同人格的包容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health
Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, retitled from Employee Assistance Quarterly to better reflect its expanded focus, presents innovative research, applied theory, and practical information to keep workplace human service administrators, counselors, and consultants up to date on the latest developments in the field. This refereed journal is an essential guide to best practice and research issues faced by EAP professionals who deal with work-related and personal issues including workplace and family wellness, employee benefits, and organizational development.
期刊最新文献
Moderating effects of self-construal on the associations of workload and role ambiguity with psychological distress: A cross-sectional and prospective study in a Japanese workplace Job satisfaction, work engagement and psychological distress among nurses: A mediated moderation model Expressive writing as a practice against work stress: An experimental study Quality of life in nurses from neurological wards: The mediating role of burnout Establishing an Employee Assistance Program at a Tertiary Healthcare Center in a Time of Multiple Crises: The Experience of the American University of Beirut Medical Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1