Yield dissection models to improve yield: a case study in tomato

IF 2.6 Q1 AGRONOMY in silico Plants Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1093/INSILICOPLANTS/DIAB012
Yutaka Tsutsumi-Morita, E. Heuvelink, S. Khaleghi, Daniela Bustos-Korts, L. Marcelis, K. Vermeer, Hannelore van Dijk, F. Millenaar, G. van Voorn, F. V. van Eeuwijk
{"title":"Yield dissection models to improve yield: a case study in tomato","authors":"Yutaka Tsutsumi-Morita, E. Heuvelink, S. Khaleghi, Daniela Bustos-Korts, L. Marcelis, K. Vermeer, Hannelore van Dijk, F. Millenaar, G. van Voorn, F. V. van Eeuwijk","doi":"10.1093/INSILICOPLANTS/DIAB012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Yield as a complex trait may either be genetically improved directly, by identifying QTLs contributing to yield, or indirectly via improvement of underlying components, where parents contribute complementary alleles to different components. We investigated the utility of two yield dissection models in tomato for identifying promising yield components and corresponding QTLs. In a harvest dissection, marketable yield was the product of number of fruits and individual fruit fresh weight. In a biomass dissection, total yield was the product of fruit fresh-dry weight ratio and total fruit dry weight. Data came from a greenhouse experiment with a population of hybrids formed from four-way RILs. Trade-offs were observed between the component traits in both dissections. Genetic improvements were possible by increasing the number of fruits and the total fruit dry weight to offset losses in fruit fresh weight and fruit fresh-dry weight ratio. Most yield QTLs colocalized with component QTLs, offering options for the construction of high-yielding genotypes. An analysis of QTL allelic effects in relation to parental origin emphasized the complementary role of the parents in the construction of desired genotypes. Multi-QTL models were used for the comparison of yield predictions from yield QTLs and predictions from the products of components following multi-QTL models for those components. Component QTLs underlying dissection models were able to predict yield with the same accuracy as yield QTLs in direct predictions. Harvest and biomass yield dissection models may serve as useful tools for yield improvement in tomato by either or both of combining individual component QTLs and multi-QTL component predictions.","PeriodicalId":36138,"journal":{"name":"in silico Plants","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/INSILICOPLANTS/DIAB012","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"in silico Plants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/INSILICOPLANTS/DIAB012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Yield as a complex trait may either be genetically improved directly, by identifying QTLs contributing to yield, or indirectly via improvement of underlying components, where parents contribute complementary alleles to different components. We investigated the utility of two yield dissection models in tomato for identifying promising yield components and corresponding QTLs. In a harvest dissection, marketable yield was the product of number of fruits and individual fruit fresh weight. In a biomass dissection, total yield was the product of fruit fresh-dry weight ratio and total fruit dry weight. Data came from a greenhouse experiment with a population of hybrids formed from four-way RILs. Trade-offs were observed between the component traits in both dissections. Genetic improvements were possible by increasing the number of fruits and the total fruit dry weight to offset losses in fruit fresh weight and fruit fresh-dry weight ratio. Most yield QTLs colocalized with component QTLs, offering options for the construction of high-yielding genotypes. An analysis of QTL allelic effects in relation to parental origin emphasized the complementary role of the parents in the construction of desired genotypes. Multi-QTL models were used for the comparison of yield predictions from yield QTLs and predictions from the products of components following multi-QTL models for those components. Component QTLs underlying dissection models were able to predict yield with the same accuracy as yield QTLs in direct predictions. Harvest and biomass yield dissection models may serve as useful tools for yield improvement in tomato by either or both of combining individual component QTLs and multi-QTL component predictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产量解剖模型提高产量:以番茄为例
产量作为一种复杂的性状,可以通过鉴定有助于产量的QTL直接进行遗传改良,也可以通过改良潜在成分间接进行遗传改良。我们研究了两个番茄产量分割模型在鉴定有前景的产量成分和相应QTL方面的效用。在收获解剖中,市场产量是果实数量和单个果实鲜重的乘积。在生物量分析中,总产量是果实鲜干重比和总干重的乘积。数据来自一项温室实验,实验对象是由四向RIL形成的杂交种群体。在两个解剖中观察到成分特征之间的权衡。通过增加果实数量和果实总干重来抵消果实鲜重和果实鲜干重比的损失,遗传改良是可能的。大多数产量QTL与组分QTL共定位,为构建高产基因型提供了选择。与亲本起源相关的QTL等位基因效应分析强调了亲本在构建所需基因型中的互补作用。多QTL模型用于比较来自产量QTL的产量预测和来自这些组分的多QTL模式之后的组分产物的预测。解剖模型下的分量QTL能够以与直接预测中的产量QTL相同的精度预测产量。收获和生物量产量解剖模型可以通过组合单个QTL和多QTL分量预测中的一个或两个,作为提高番茄产量的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
in silico Plants
in silico Plants Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Model-based inference of a dual role for HOPS in regulating guard cell vacuole fusion. Playing a crop simulation model using symbols and sounds: the ‘mandala’ A Scalable Pipeline to Create Synthetic Datasets from Functional-Structural Plant Models for Deep Learning In a PICKLE: A gold standard entity and relation corpus for the molecular plant sciences A comparison of empirical and mechanistic models for wheat yield prediction at field level in Moroccan rainfed areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1