Effects of Steady State and High-Intensity Exercise on Compensatory Eating Behavior

E. Sauers, J. Klein, Chad A. Witmer, G. Moir, S. Davis
{"title":"Effects of Steady State and High-Intensity Exercise on Compensatory Eating Behavior","authors":"E. Sauers, J. Klein, Chad A. Witmer, G. Moir, S. Davis","doi":"10.53520/jen2022.103119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Studies have shown differences in weight loss between high-intensity interval training (HI) and moderate continuous training (SS) potentially due to compensatory eating behaviors. The aim of this study is to observe the differences in eating behaviors HI and SS exercise.\nMethods: Nine lean, college-aged individuals and participated in this study. Subjects completed three trials in a randomized order. During HI, subjects completed 16 intervals alternating between 90% and 50% VO2max (1:1). During SS, subjects ran at 70% VO2max. Subjects sat quietly during the control trial. Food logs were collected 24 hours before and after exercise bouts. Data was analyzed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. All data are presented as mean ± SE.\nResults: Caloric intake was not different between trials (CON: 1558 ± 172 kcal, HI: 1851±150 kcal, SS: 1683±143 kcal, p=0.23). Carbohydrate was not different between trials (CON: 186 ± 25g, HI: 225 ± 24g, SS: 201 ± 23g, p=0.41). Fat was not different between trials (CON: 55 ± 8g, HI: 73 ± 9g, SS: 63 ± 5g, p=0.16). Protein was not different between trials (CON: 78 ± 28g, HI: 69 ± 10g, SS: 70 ± 14g, p=0.64).\nConclusions: Acute HI exercise did not lead to different compensatory eating behaviors compared to SS exercise. Practitioners may feel confident to recommend any exercise model without concern for compensatory overeating.","PeriodicalId":73743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of exercise and nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of exercise and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53520/jen2022.103119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have shown differences in weight loss between high-intensity interval training (HI) and moderate continuous training (SS) potentially due to compensatory eating behaviors. The aim of this study is to observe the differences in eating behaviors HI and SS exercise. Methods: Nine lean, college-aged individuals and participated in this study. Subjects completed three trials in a randomized order. During HI, subjects completed 16 intervals alternating between 90% and 50% VO2max (1:1). During SS, subjects ran at 70% VO2max. Subjects sat quietly during the control trial. Food logs were collected 24 hours before and after exercise bouts. Data was analyzed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. All data are presented as mean ± SE. Results: Caloric intake was not different between trials (CON: 1558 ± 172 kcal, HI: 1851±150 kcal, SS: 1683±143 kcal, p=0.23). Carbohydrate was not different between trials (CON: 186 ± 25g, HI: 225 ± 24g, SS: 201 ± 23g, p=0.41). Fat was not different between trials (CON: 55 ± 8g, HI: 73 ± 9g, SS: 63 ± 5g, p=0.16). Protein was not different between trials (CON: 78 ± 28g, HI: 69 ± 10g, SS: 70 ± 14g, p=0.64). Conclusions: Acute HI exercise did not lead to different compensatory eating behaviors compared to SS exercise. Practitioners may feel confident to recommend any exercise model without concern for compensatory overeating.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳态高强度运动对补偿性饮食行为的影响
引言:研究表明,高强度间歇训练(HI)和中等持续训练(SS)在减肥方面的差异可能是由于补偿性饮食行为。本研究的目的是观察HI和SS运动在饮食行为上的差异。方法:9名大学年龄的瘦子参与本研究。受试者按照随机顺序完成了三项试验。在HI期间,受试者完成了16个间隔,在90%和50%VO2max(1:1)之间交替。在SS期间,受试者的最大摄氧量为70%。对照试验期间,受试者安静地坐着。在运动前后24小时收集食物日志。数据采用单因素重复测量方差分析法进行分析。所有数据均以平均值±SE表示。结果:各试验之间的热量摄入没有差异(CON:1558±172 kcal,HI:1851±150 kcal,SS:1683±143 kcal,p=0.23)。碳水化合物各试验之间没有差异(CON:186±25 g,HI:225±24 g,SS:201±23 g,p=0.41)。脂肪各试验之间无差异(CON:55±8 g,HI:73±9 g,SS:63±5 g,p=0.16)。蛋白质各试验之间也没有差异试验(CON:78±28g,HI:69±10g,SS:70±14g,p=0.064)。结论:急性HI运动与SS运动相比,不会导致不同的代偿性进食行为。从业者可能会有信心推荐任何运动模式,而不必担心补偿性的过量饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of MCT Oil and Caffeine on Substrate Metabolism during Submaximal Exercise Body Composition as a Predictor of Performance on the Army Combat Fitness Test Total Score for ROTC Cadets Eating Habits as a Predictor of Performance on the Army Combat Fitness Test Total Score for ROTC Cadets The Effects of a Multi-Ingredient Pre-Workout Supplement on Repeated Sprint Ability: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study Perspectives of Health and Eating Behaviors in Marathon and Half-Marathoners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1