Post-pandemic responsible management education: an invitation for a conceptual and practice renewal and for a narrative change

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Global Responsibility Pub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI:10.1108/jgr-12-2020-0110
Lovasoa Ramboarisata
{"title":"Post-pandemic responsible management education: an invitation for a conceptual and practice renewal and for a narrative change","authors":"Lovasoa Ramboarisata","doi":"10.1108/jgr-12-2020-0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis essay makes the point that the corona crisis should motivate business schools and scholars to reflect on their interpretation of responsible management education (RME). It suggests both a conceptual and a practice renewal of RME, by respectively highlighting the relevance of the constructs organizational climate (OC) and professorial roles (PR) and calling for an enactment of business schools’ employer responsibility. It also argues that beyond mere techno-pedagogical and strategic developments, business schools’ post-pandemic challenges should encompass a narrative change.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nReview of recent studies on the neo-liberalization of business schools and the implications of the latter on management educators and management education.\n\n\nFindings\nThe corona crisis carries the risk of putting center stage and amplifying the entrepreneurial narrative in business schools. Such a narrative is deeply rooted in neoliberal assumptions. However, the corona crisis is also an opportunity to renew RME and to favour critical studies, encourage moral imagination and embark collectively on systemic activism.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLike other recent work, this paper reflects on what RME should mean and how business schools should set and fulfill their RME agenda in the aftermath of the corona crisis. To complement those former work, this paper proposes that the constructs of OC and PR be invited into the conceptualization of RME and insists that business schools acknowledge their employer responsibility.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-12-2020-0110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This essay makes the point that the corona crisis should motivate business schools and scholars to reflect on their interpretation of responsible management education (RME). It suggests both a conceptual and a practice renewal of RME, by respectively highlighting the relevance of the constructs organizational climate (OC) and professorial roles (PR) and calling for an enactment of business schools’ employer responsibility. It also argues that beyond mere techno-pedagogical and strategic developments, business schools’ post-pandemic challenges should encompass a narrative change. Design/methodology/approach Review of recent studies on the neo-liberalization of business schools and the implications of the latter on management educators and management education. Findings The corona crisis carries the risk of putting center stage and amplifying the entrepreneurial narrative in business schools. Such a narrative is deeply rooted in neoliberal assumptions. However, the corona crisis is also an opportunity to renew RME and to favour critical studies, encourage moral imagination and embark collectively on systemic activism. Originality/value Like other recent work, this paper reflects on what RME should mean and how business schools should set and fulfill their RME agenda in the aftermath of the corona crisis. To complement those former work, this paper proposes that the constructs of OC and PR be invited into the conceptualization of RME and insists that business schools acknowledge their employer responsibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行后负责任的管理教育:邀请更新概念和实践并改变叙述
本文认为,冠状病毒危机应该促使商学院和学者反思他们对负责任管理教育(RME)的解释。通过分别强调构建组织气候(OC)和教授角色(PR)的相关性,并呼吁制定商学院的雇主责任,建议对RME进行概念和实践上的更新。它还认为,除了单纯的技术教学和战略发展之外,商学院在大流行后面临的挑战还应包括叙事上的改变。设计/方法论/方法回顾最近关于商学院新自由化的研究,以及后者对管理教育者和管理教育的影响。新冠肺炎危机有可能使商学院的创业叙事成为焦点,并被放大。这样的叙述深深植根于新自由主义的假设。然而,冠状病毒危机也是一个机会,可以更新RME,支持批判性研究,鼓励道德想象,并集体开展系统行动。与最近的其他研究一样,这篇论文反映了RME应该意味着什么,以及商学院在冠状病毒危机之后应该如何制定和实现他们的RME议程。为了补充前人的研究成果,本文建议将企业主管和公共关系的概念引入到RME的概念中,并坚持商学院承认其雇主的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Corporate social responsibility and gig worker commitment: empowerment and trust as mediators A concise autobiography of microfinancing: the pursuit of a world without poverty Sustainability in banking literature: review and synthesis of thematic structure Linking corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment: the role of employee job satisfaction Institutional pressure and responsible innovation: how big data analytics adoption drives manufacturing SMEs toward competitiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1