Validation of a Novel Point-of-Care Testing Device Designed for Assessment of NT-pro BNP

Anders O Larsson
{"title":"Validation of a Novel Point-of-Care Testing Device Designed for Assessment of NT-pro BNP","authors":"Anders O Larsson","doi":"10.29011/2688-7460.100231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Our main objective was to compare Point-Of-Care Technology (POCT) to central laboratory immunochemistry testing, to assess N-terminal pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) in ambulatory patients. A second objective was to use POCT to analyze NT-proBNP in a cohort of healthy blood donors to define reference values. Methods: Blood samples were obtained from 102 outpatients and 133 blood donors, respectively. Samples analyzed using a point-of-care instrument [NT-proBNPLumiraDx (LumiraDx, Solna, Sweden)] were compared to a commercial electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method [(NT-proBNPRoche) on the Cobas Pro analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany)]. The study was ethically approved (01–367) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Values are given as Median and Interquartile Range (IQR). Results: There was a distinct correlation between the two assays for assessing the circulating levels of NT-proBNP in outpatients (R² = 0.9546). NT-proBNPLumiraDx ranged between 50–3966 ng/L [Median: 276 (IQR: 679)] whereas NT-proBNPRoche ranged between 50–3820 ng/L; (Median: 268 (IQR: 628)]. NT-proBNPLumiraDx was 3% higher than NT-proBNPRoche (p<0.05). NT-proBNPLumiraDx levels were not affected by age in our cohort of blood donors. Conclusion: In cases where short turn-around-times for assessment of NT-proBNP are desirable, the LumiraDx instrument can safely be used as an analytical option.","PeriodicalId":93553,"journal":{"name":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Our main objective was to compare Point-Of-Care Technology (POCT) to central laboratory immunochemistry testing, to assess N-terminal pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) in ambulatory patients. A second objective was to use POCT to analyze NT-proBNP in a cohort of healthy blood donors to define reference values. Methods: Blood samples were obtained from 102 outpatients and 133 blood donors, respectively. Samples analyzed using a point-of-care instrument [NT-proBNPLumiraDx (LumiraDx, Solna, Sweden)] were compared to a commercial electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method [(NT-proBNPRoche) on the Cobas Pro analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany)]. The study was ethically approved (01–367) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Values are given as Median and Interquartile Range (IQR). Results: There was a distinct correlation between the two assays for assessing the circulating levels of NT-proBNP in outpatients (R² = 0.9546). NT-proBNPLumiraDx ranged between 50–3966 ng/L [Median: 276 (IQR: 679)] whereas NT-proBNPRoche ranged between 50–3820 ng/L; (Median: 268 (IQR: 628)]. NT-proBNPLumiraDx was 3% higher than NT-proBNPRoche (p<0.05). NT-proBNPLumiraDx levels were not affected by age in our cohort of blood donors. Conclusion: In cases where short turn-around-times for assessment of NT-proBNP are desirable, the LumiraDx instrument can safely be used as an analytical option.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计用于评估NT-pro-BNP的新型护理点测试装置的验证
目的:我们的主要目的是将护理点技术(POCT)与中心实验室免疫化学测试进行比较,以评估门诊患者的N-末端促B型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)。第二个目的是使用POCT分析健康献血者队列中的NT-proBNP,以确定参考值。方法:分别从102名门诊病人和133名献血者中采集血样。将使用护理点仪器[NT-proBNPLumiraDx(LumiraDx,Solna,Sweden)]分析的样品与商业电化学发光免疫测定方法[(NT-proBNPRoche)在Cobas Pro分析仪(Roche Diagnostics,Mannheim,Germany)上]进行比较。该研究获得伦理批准(01–367),并符合赫尔辛基宣言。数值以中位数和四分位间距(IQR)表示。结果:用于评估门诊患者NT-proBNP循环水平的两种测定法之间存在明显的相关性(R²=0.9546)。NT-proBNPLumiraDx范围在50–3966纳克/升之间[中位数:276(IQR:679)],而NT-proBNPRoche范围在50-3820纳克/升;(中位数:268(IQR:628)]。NT-proBNPLumiraDx比NT-proBNPRoche高3%(p<0.05)。在我们的献血队列中,NT-proBNPL umiraDX水平不受年龄的影响。结论:在需要短周转时间来评估NT-proBNP的情况下,LumiraDx仪器可以安全地用作分析选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Polishing Resident Advocacy Curriculums in Primary Care Feasibility and Utility of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Primary Care Practice. EKOAP Pilot Study Right Cornual Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Therapy for Treatment of Acute Tonsillitis at Primary Care level in Qatar- Clinical Audit Report Validation of a Novel Point-of-Care Testing Device Designed for Assessment of NT-pro BNP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1