Does protection policy actually produce equality among labours? A tentative rules approach to the answers protective problems migrant labour : case migrant labours from East Java, Indonesia

NeoBis Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.21107/NBS.V11I2.3043
Anita Kristina
{"title":"Does protection policy actually produce equality among labours? A tentative rules approach to the answers protective problems migrant labour : case migrant labours from East Java, Indonesia","authors":"Anita Kristina","doi":"10.21107/NBS.V11I2.3043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analysis effectiveness of the protective rule and their practical effects. Design/approach - This paper reviews the most important tentative rules and focusing on the principal agent model, which considers the functioning insurance policy to give equality protection. The research has a crucial to analyses the current mechanism of protection policy of cause for disfunction of rules, it actually causes the most orientation to be assumed by labour migran as a principal and the subject of the protection policy. Case study in East Java, Indonesia. Findings – This mechanism appears theoretically coherent with the protection policy, of equality among labour migran with their performances, but this effect is baced on the benefits of their future performance; this is happened only within their state that their work. The paper concludes that the best effective protection for the labour migran who be a strong protection of the strong coordination actors or the harmonization concepts – by a system of information, professional procedure, capable of reducing as much rules, either pre-existing of the design protection policy. Value – The paper offers insight into the issue of whether rules protection actually produce equality among migrant labour.","PeriodicalId":30938,"journal":{"name":"NeoBis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeoBis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21107/NBS.V11I2.3043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analysis effectiveness of the protective rule and their practical effects. Design/approach - This paper reviews the most important tentative rules and focusing on the principal agent model, which considers the functioning insurance policy to give equality protection. The research has a crucial to analyses the current mechanism of protection policy of cause for disfunction of rules, it actually causes the most orientation to be assumed by labour migran as a principal and the subject of the protection policy. Case study in East Java, Indonesia. Findings – This mechanism appears theoretically coherent with the protection policy, of equality among labour migran with their performances, but this effect is baced on the benefits of their future performance; this is happened only within their state that their work. The paper concludes that the best effective protection for the labour migran who be a strong protection of the strong coordination actors or the harmonization concepts – by a system of information, professional procedure, capable of reducing as much rules, either pre-existing of the design protection policy. Value – The paper offers insight into the issue of whether rules protection actually produce equality among migrant labour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护政策是否真的产生了劳动者之间的平等?移民劳工保护问题答案的暂定规则方法——以印度尼西亚东爪哇的移民劳工为例
目的-本文的目的是分析保护规则的有效性及其实际效果。设计/方法-本文回顾了最重要的尝试性规则,并重点讨论了委托代理模型,该模型考虑了有效的保险政策提供平等保护。本研究对分析现行保护政策机制的规则失能成因具有重要意义,它实际上造成了农民工作为保护政策主体和主体承担的最大取向。印度尼西亚东爪哇的案例研究。研究结果-这一机制在理论上似乎与保护政策是一致的,即劳工移徙者与其绩效之间的平等,但这种效果是基于他们未来绩效的利益;这只发生在他们工作的状态内。本文的结论是,对劳务移徙者的最有效保护是强有力的协调行为者或协调概念的强有力保护-通过信息系统,专业程序,能够减少尽可能多的规则,无论是预先存在的设计保护政策。价值-本文对规则保护是否真的在农民工中产生平等的问题提供了深入的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
APAKAH METODE KASUS EFEKTIF SEBAGAI ALAT PEMBELAJARAN PERPAJAKAN PENGARUH STRES KERJA, EMPLOYEE ENGAGMENT, DAN KEDISIPLINAN TERHADAP KINERJA DENGAN KEPUASAN KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING PADA KARYAWAN CV. KARYA MANUNGGAL SEMARANG PENGARUH NILAI PERUSAHAAN, PERTUMBUHAN PERUSAHAAN DAN REPUTASI AUDITOR TERHADAP PERATAAN LABA DI SEKTOR PERBANKAN STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN DESA WISATA DI KECAMATAN KARANGPLOSO KABUPATEN MALANG Does protection policy actually produce equality among labours? A tentative rules approach to the answers protective problems migrant labour : case migrant labours from East Java, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1