What Intellectual Ethics for Contemporary Science? Perspectives of Virtue Epistemology

Q4 Arts and Humanities Ruch Filozoficzny Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.12775/rf.2021.034
Dominik Jarczewski
{"title":"What Intellectual Ethics for Contemporary Science? Perspectives of Virtue Epistemology","authors":"Dominik Jarczewski","doi":"10.12775/rf.2021.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In face of unethical incidents that threaten the world of science, a question of the necessity and a possible shape of intellectual ethics has been raised. The article argues that advantages of virtue epistemology make it more attractive than other models of intellectual ethics (deontology, in particular). To that purpose, it reviews alternative models for intellectual ethics, analyses and criticises deontological approach and demonstrates the virtues of the virtue approach. As problems with implementation of virtue ethics have been put against that approach, the article addresses the question of how to promote virtue intellectual ethics. It discusses four possible methods of formation in virtues: theoretical, success-oriented, social and based on emulating exemplars. It argues for the role of excellent exemplars (both direct and narrative) whose emulation forms virtues in agent. The conclusions of the article should transform the way we think about intellectual ethics and promote it.","PeriodicalId":36471,"journal":{"name":"Ruch Filozoficzny","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ruch Filozoficzny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/rf.2021.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In face of unethical incidents that threaten the world of science, a question of the necessity and a possible shape of intellectual ethics has been raised. The article argues that advantages of virtue epistemology make it more attractive than other models of intellectual ethics (deontology, in particular). To that purpose, it reviews alternative models for intellectual ethics, analyses and criticises deontological approach and demonstrates the virtues of the virtue approach. As problems with implementation of virtue ethics have been put against that approach, the article addresses the question of how to promote virtue intellectual ethics. It discusses four possible methods of formation in virtues: theoretical, success-oriented, social and based on emulating exemplars. It argues for the role of excellent exemplars (both direct and narrative) whose emulation forms virtues in agent. The conclusions of the article should transform the way we think about intellectual ethics and promote it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代科学的知识伦理是什么?美德认识论的视角
面对威胁科学世界的不道德事件,人们提出了知识伦理的必要性和可能形式的问题。文章认为,美德认识论的优势使其比其他知识伦理模式(特别是义务论)更有吸引力。为此,它回顾了知识伦理学的替代模型,分析和批评了义务论方法,并展示了美德方法的优点。针对这种方法在实施美德伦理方面存在的问题,本文提出了如何促进美德知识伦理的问题。它讨论了美德形成的四种可能方法:理论的、以成功为导向的、社会的和基于榜样的。它主张优秀的榜样(包括直接的和叙述的)的作用,他们的模仿形成了代理人的美德。文章的结论应该改变我们对知识伦理的思考方式,并促进它的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ruch Filozoficzny
Ruch Filozoficzny Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cień na oświeceniowym rozumie, czyli Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant i Hugo Kołłątaj o kobietach, ich roli społecznej i edukacji Sprawiedliwość i równość w interpretacji liderów polskiej myśli oświeceniowej Zetetyczny rejs Kwestia wolności w ujęciu Spinozy i Leibniza a perspektywa kompatybilistyczna Anthony Collins i jego pierwsza rozprawa (An Essay Concerning the Use of Reason in Propositions, The Evidence whereof depends upon Human Testimony)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1