Adjustment for collider bias in the hospitalized Covid-19 setting

Moslem Taheri Soodejani , Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei , Mohammad Hassan Lotfi , Maryam Nazemipour , Mohammad Ali Mansournia
{"title":"Adjustment for collider bias in the hospitalized Covid-19 setting","authors":"Moslem Taheri Soodejani ,&nbsp;Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hassan Lotfi ,&nbsp;Maryam Nazemipour ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Mansournia","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Causal directed acyclic graphs (cDAGs) are frequently used to identify confounding and collider bias. We demonstrate how to use causal directed acyclic graphs to adjust for collider bias in the hospitalized Covid-19 setting.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>According to the cDAGs, three types of modeling have been performed. In model 1, only vaccination is entered as an independent variable. In model 2, in addition to vaccination, age is entered the model to adjust for collider bias due to the conditioning of hospitalization. In model 3, comorbidities are also included for adjustment of collider bias due to the conditioning of hospitalization in different biasing paths intercepting age and comorbidities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no evidence of the effect of vaccination on preventing death due to Covid-19 in model 1. In the second model, where age was included as a covariate, a protective role for vaccination became evident. In model 3, after including chronic diseases as other covariates, the protective effect was slightly strengthened.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Studying hospitalized patients is subject to collider-stratification bias. Like confounding, this type of selection bias can be adjusted for by inclusion of the risk factors of the outcome which also affect hospitalization in the regression model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113323000238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Causal directed acyclic graphs (cDAGs) are frequently used to identify confounding and collider bias. We demonstrate how to use causal directed acyclic graphs to adjust for collider bias in the hospitalized Covid-19 setting.

Materials and methods

According to the cDAGs, three types of modeling have been performed. In model 1, only vaccination is entered as an independent variable. In model 2, in addition to vaccination, age is entered the model to adjust for collider bias due to the conditioning of hospitalization. In model 3, comorbidities are also included for adjustment of collider bias due to the conditioning of hospitalization in different biasing paths intercepting age and comorbidities.

Results

There was no evidence of the effect of vaccination on preventing death due to Covid-19 in model 1. In the second model, where age was included as a covariate, a protective role for vaccination became evident. In model 3, after including chronic diseases as other covariates, the protective effect was slightly strengthened.

Conclusion

Studying hospitalized patients is subject to collider-stratification bias. Like confounding, this type of selection bias can be adjusted for by inclusion of the risk factors of the outcome which also affect hospitalization in the regression model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎住院环境中对撞机偏差的调整
背景因果有向无环图(cDAG)经常被用来识别混淆和对撞机偏差。我们演示了如何在住院的新冠肺炎环境中使用因果有向无环图来调整对撞机偏差。材料和方法根据cDAG,进行了三种类型的建模。在模型1中,只有疫苗接种作为自变量输入。在模型2中,除了接种疫苗外,年龄也被输入到模型中,以调整由于住院条件而产生的对撞机偏差。在模型3中,合并症也被包括在内,用于调整碰撞器偏差,因为住院条件是在不同的偏差路径中截取年龄和合并症。结果在模型1中,没有证据表明疫苗接种对预防新冠肺炎死亡的效果。在第二个模型中,年龄作为协变量,疫苗接种的保护作用变得明显。在模型3中,在将慢性病纳入其他协变量后,保护作用略有增强。结论研究住院患者存在对撞机分层偏差。与混杂因素一样,这种类型的选择偏差可以通过在回归模型中纳入同样影响住院治疗的结果的风险因素来进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Epidemiology
Global Epidemiology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
39 days
期刊最新文献
A note on handling conditional missing values Tailored guidance to apply the Estimand framework to Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) studies Improving the timeliness of birth registration in Fiji through a financial incentive Predicting adolescent psychopathology from early life factors: A machine learning tutorial Challenging unverified assumptions in causal claims: Do gas stoves increase risk of pediatric asthma?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1