Die Beweglichkeit der Kritik. Zur Wechselbeziehung von Kontextualisierung und Objektivierung im digitalen Zeitalter

Christoph Haker, Lukas Otterspeer
{"title":"Die Beweglichkeit der Kritik. Zur Wechselbeziehung von Kontextualisierung und Objektivierung im digitalen Zeitalter","authors":"Christoph Haker, Lukas Otterspeer","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2021.14.2.1058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given that digitisation and datafication go hand in hand with post-truth phenomena and claims to neutrality, we plead for an agility of critique. The problems of post-truth phenomena and claims to neutrality are that they are associated with relativistic and technocratic tendencies. These tendencies require an agility of critique that contrasts post-truth phenomena with a movement from contextualisation to objectivation and the claimed neutrality with a movement from objectivation to contextualisation. However, such agility of critique faces significant challenges: Conceptually, this agility is accused of being relativistic itself, and from a scientific-historical perspective, objectivation and contextualisation are regarded as incompatible forms of reflection. The goal of our contribution is therefore a rehabilitation of the agility of critique, which we theoretically substantiate with Bourdieu’s participant objectivation and the concept of the divided habitus.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"14 1","pages":"31-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2021.14.2.1058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given that digitisation and datafication go hand in hand with post-truth phenomena and claims to neutrality, we plead for an agility of critique. The problems of post-truth phenomena and claims to neutrality are that they are associated with relativistic and technocratic tendencies. These tendencies require an agility of critique that contrasts post-truth phenomena with a movement from contextualisation to objectivation and the claimed neutrality with a movement from objectivation to contextualisation. However, such agility of critique faces significant challenges: Conceptually, this agility is accused of being relativistic itself, and from a scientific-historical perspective, objectivation and contextualisation are regarded as incompatible forms of reflection. The goal of our contribution is therefore a rehabilitation of the agility of critique, which we theoretically substantiate with Bourdieu’s participant objectivation and the concept of the divided habitus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批评的敏捷性。数字时代语境化与客体化的互动
鉴于数字化和数据化与后真相现象和中立性主张齐头并进,我们呼吁批评的灵活性。后真相现象和中立主张的问题在于,它们与相对论和技术官僚倾向有关。这些趋势需要敏捷的批判,将后真相现象与从情境化到客体化的运动进行对比,并将声称的中立性与从客体化到情境化的运动相对比。然而,这种批判的敏捷性面临着重大挑战:从概念上讲,这种敏捷性本身被指责为相对论性的,从科学历史的角度来看,客观化和语境化被视为不相容的反思形式。因此,我们的贡献的目标是恢复批判的灵活性,我们用布迪厄的参与者客体化和分裂习惯的概念从理论上证实了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Louise Amoore: Cloud Ethics. Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others Editorial: Futures of Critique in the Digital Age „Wie ist Geschichte a priori möglich?“ Algorithmische Vorhersage und die Aufgabe der Kritik Distributed Planned Economies in the Age of their Technical Feasibility Landnahme, analog und digital. Ursprüngliche Akkumulation in den Kontrollgesellschaften
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1