Clinical Evaluation of Exertional Dyspnea in Adult Pectus Excavatum Patients

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2022-01-28 DOI:10.2174/1573398x18666220128110107
Mateo C. Houle, T. Sjulin, I. Mcinnis, R. Walter, M. Morris
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of Exertional Dyspnea in Adult Pectus Excavatum Patients","authors":"Mateo C. Houle, T. Sjulin, I. Mcinnis, R. Walter, M. Morris","doi":"10.2174/1573398x18666220128110107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nEvaluation of patients with pectus excavatum has primarily been focused on the pediatric population who undergo surgical correction of sternal defects mainly for cosmetic reasons combined with exercise-limiting symptoms. The extent of cardiopulmonary improvement in this population based on cardiac imaging, pulmonary function testing, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing may be highly variable. There is no current consensus on the limitations of cardiopulmonary impairment or potential improvement from surgical repair in pediatric patients. Limited data has published in the medical literature on the evaluation of adults with pectus excavatum who may also present with a variety of clinical symptoms. Adult patients with exercise limitation and pectus excavatum may present with exertional dyspnea, chest discomfort, palpitations/tachycardia, exercise-induced wheezing, and use of bronchodilators for asthma-like symptoms. While numerous published review articles outline clinical evaluation and surgical treatment for younger patients, comprehensive evaluation for these adult patients has not been fully elucidated. There is no current consensus on the underlying cause of cardiopulmonary impairment in adult patients or their potential improvement from surgical repair. This review focuses on the recommended evaluation of adult patients to discern the potential cardiopulmonary limitations to exercise due to pectus excavatum, especially in physically fit adults such as active duty military personnel. Two illustrative cases are presented to describe the complexity of the evaluation of adult patients and potential need for surgical correction.\n","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x18666220128110107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation of patients with pectus excavatum has primarily been focused on the pediatric population who undergo surgical correction of sternal defects mainly for cosmetic reasons combined with exercise-limiting symptoms. The extent of cardiopulmonary improvement in this population based on cardiac imaging, pulmonary function testing, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing may be highly variable. There is no current consensus on the limitations of cardiopulmonary impairment or potential improvement from surgical repair in pediatric patients. Limited data has published in the medical literature on the evaluation of adults with pectus excavatum who may also present with a variety of clinical symptoms. Adult patients with exercise limitation and pectus excavatum may present with exertional dyspnea, chest discomfort, palpitations/tachycardia, exercise-induced wheezing, and use of bronchodilators for asthma-like symptoms. While numerous published review articles outline clinical evaluation and surgical treatment for younger patients, comprehensive evaluation for these adult patients has not been fully elucidated. There is no current consensus on the underlying cause of cardiopulmonary impairment in adult patients or their potential improvement from surgical repair. This review focuses on the recommended evaluation of adult patients to discern the potential cardiopulmonary limitations to exercise due to pectus excavatum, especially in physically fit adults such as active duty military personnel. Two illustrative cases are presented to describe the complexity of the evaluation of adult patients and potential need for surgical correction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人挖掘胸肌患者运动性呼吸困难的临床评价
对漏斗胸患者的评估主要集中在主要因美观原因并伴有运动限制症状而接受胸骨缺损手术矫正的儿科人群。基于心脏成像、肺功能测试和心肺运动测试,这一人群的心肺改善程度可能是高度可变的。目前还没有共识的心肺功能障碍的局限性或潜在的改善手术修复在儿科患者。有限的数据已发表在医学文献评价成人漏斗胸谁也可能出现各种临床症状。运动受限和漏斗胸的成年患者可能表现为运动性呼吸困难、胸部不适、心悸/心动过速、运动性喘息,并使用支气管扩张剂治疗哮喘样症状。虽然许多已发表的综述文章概述了年轻患者的临床评估和手术治疗,但对这些成年患者的综合评估尚未完全阐明。目前对于成人患者心肺功能障碍的潜在原因或手术修复对其的潜在改善尚无共识。这篇综述的重点是对成年患者的推荐评估,以识别因漏斗胸肌而导致的潜在心肺功能限制,特别是对身体健康的成年人,如现役军人。两个说明性的情况下,提出了描述的复杂性评估成人患者和手术矫正的潜在需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Lung Function and Quality of Life in COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Study Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Group 1 (Part A): Overview, Classification, Clinical Subsets, and Workup Deteriorating Pulmonary Functions in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis- A Pilot Study From South India COVID-19 Vaccines and the Menstrual Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Study NAT2 Gene Variants as a Provocative Factor for the Severe Course of COVID-19 Pneumonia in Ukrainian Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1