Statistical tools for water quality assessment and monitoring in river ecosystems – a scoping review and recommendations for data analysis

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 WATER RESOURCES Water Quality Research Journal Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI:10.2166/wqrj.2022.028
Stefan G. Schreiber, Sanja Schreiber, R. Tanna, D. Roberts, T. Arciszewski
{"title":"Statistical tools for water quality assessment and monitoring in river ecosystems – a scoping review and recommendations for data analysis","authors":"Stefan G. Schreiber, Sanja Schreiber, R. Tanna, D. Roberts, T. Arciszewski","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2022.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Robust scientific inference is crucial to ensure evidence-based decision making. Accordingly, the selection of appropriate statistical tools and experimental designs is integral to achieve accuracy from data analytical processes. Environmental monitoring of water quality has become increasingly common and widespread as a result of technological advances, leading to an abundance of datasets. We conducted a scoping review of the water quality literature and found that correlation and linear regression are by far the most used statistical tools. However, the accuracy of inferences drawn from ordinary least squares (OLS) techniques depends on a set of assumptions, most prominently: (a) independence among observations, (b) normally distributed errors, (c) equal variances of errors, and (d) balanced designs. Environmental data, however, are often faced with temporal and spatial dependencies, and unbalanced designs, thus making OLS techniques not suitable to provide valid statistical inferences. Generalized least squares (GLS), linear mixed-effect models (LMMs), and generalized linear mixed-effect models (GLMMs), as well as Bayesian data analyses, have been developed to better tackle these problems. Recent progress in the development of statistical software has made these approaches more accessible and user-friendly. We provide a high-level summary and practical guidance for those statistical techniques.","PeriodicalId":23720,"journal":{"name":"Water Quality Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Quality Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2022.028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Robust scientific inference is crucial to ensure evidence-based decision making. Accordingly, the selection of appropriate statistical tools and experimental designs is integral to achieve accuracy from data analytical processes. Environmental monitoring of water quality has become increasingly common and widespread as a result of technological advances, leading to an abundance of datasets. We conducted a scoping review of the water quality literature and found that correlation and linear regression are by far the most used statistical tools. However, the accuracy of inferences drawn from ordinary least squares (OLS) techniques depends on a set of assumptions, most prominently: (a) independence among observations, (b) normally distributed errors, (c) equal variances of errors, and (d) balanced designs. Environmental data, however, are often faced with temporal and spatial dependencies, and unbalanced designs, thus making OLS techniques not suitable to provide valid statistical inferences. Generalized least squares (GLS), linear mixed-effect models (LMMs), and generalized linear mixed-effect models (GLMMs), as well as Bayesian data analyses, have been developed to better tackle these problems. Recent progress in the development of statistical software has made these approaches more accessible and user-friendly. We provide a high-level summary and practical guidance for those statistical techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于河流生态系统水质评估和监测的统计工具——范围审查和数据分析建议
强有力的科学推理对于确保基于证据的决策至关重要。因此,选择适当的统计工具和实验设计对于实现数据分析过程的准确性是不可或缺的。由于技术进步,水质环境监测变得越来越普遍和广泛,导致数据集丰富。我们对水质文献进行了范围审查,发现相关性和线性回归是迄今为止最常用的统计工具。然而,从普通最小二乘(OLS)技术中得出的推断的准确性取决于一系列假设,最重要的是:(a)观测值之间的独立性,(b)正态分布误差,(c)误差方差相等,以及(d)平衡设计。然而,环境数据经常面临时空依赖性和不平衡设计,因此使OLS技术不适合提供有效的统计推断。广义最小二乘模型(GLS)、线性混合效应模型(lms)、广义线性混合效应模型(glmm)以及贝叶斯数据分析方法已经得到了发展,以更好地解决这些问题。最近在统计软件开发方面取得的进展使这些方法更易于使用和用户友好。我们为这些统计技术提供了一个高层次的总结和实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of filter for canal water potability Phosphorus removal and recovery from anaerobic bioreactor effluent using a batch electrocoagulation process A Fuzzy Inference System for enhanced groundwater quality assessment and index determination The risk of bacterial virulence in the face of concentrated river pollution Efficient removal of perfluorinated compounds with the polyamide nanofiltration membrane and membrane fouling resistance analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1