Public Sector Organizations and Cocreation With Citizens: A Literature Review on Benefits, Drivers, and Barriers

N. Baptista, H. Alves, Nelson Matos
{"title":"Public Sector Organizations and Cocreation With Citizens: A Literature Review on Benefits, Drivers, and Barriers","authors":"N. Baptista, H. Alves, Nelson Matos","doi":"10.1080/10495142.2019.1589623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cocreation has captured the attention of public managers and policymakers and yet the literature focusing in the public sector is still relatively dispersed. In this literature review we present a contextualized analysis of the potential reasons that lead public sector organizations to cocreate with citizens and identify potential barriers that may hamper the adoption of cocreation in public settings. The analysis undertaken allowed us to conclude that the topic is increasingly capturing the interest of researchers, although the state of the literature is characterized by a reduced heterogeneity in research methods. We classified cocreation benefits in the public sector as innovation related, improved decision-making, and symbolic related, and we categorized the drivers for cocreation according to three broad categories: external, relation-specific and internal. Finally, we identified potential barriers of cocreation, including structural, organizational, and behavioral barriers.","PeriodicalId":46735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","volume":"32 1","pages":"217 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2019.1589623","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2019.1589623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cocreation has captured the attention of public managers and policymakers and yet the literature focusing in the public sector is still relatively dispersed. In this literature review we present a contextualized analysis of the potential reasons that lead public sector organizations to cocreate with citizens and identify potential barriers that may hamper the adoption of cocreation in public settings. The analysis undertaken allowed us to conclude that the topic is increasingly capturing the interest of researchers, although the state of the literature is characterized by a reduced heterogeneity in research methods. We classified cocreation benefits in the public sector as innovation related, improved decision-making, and symbolic related, and we categorized the drivers for cocreation according to three broad categories: external, relation-specific and internal. Finally, we identified potential barriers of cocreation, including structural, organizational, and behavioral barriers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共部门组织与公民合作:利益、驱动因素和障碍的文献综述
共同创造已经引起了公共管理者和政策制定者的注意,但关于公共部门的文献仍然相对分散。在这篇文献综述中,我们对导致公共部门组织与公民共同创造的潜在原因进行了情境化分析,并确定了可能阻碍在公共环境中采用共同创造的潜在障碍。所进行的分析使我们得出结论,尽管文献状况的特点是研究方法的异质性降低,但该主题正日益引起研究人员的兴趣。我们将公共部门的共同创造利益分为创新相关、改进决策和象征相关,并将共同创造的驱动因素分为三大类:外部、特定关系和内部。最后,我们确定了共同创造的潜在障碍,包括结构、组织和行为障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing Barriers to Individual Recycling: A Qualitative Study with Multiple Stakeholders in Türkiye Nonprofits, Social Media, and Mission Sympathy and Guilt: Optimizing Advertising Appeals for Charitable Giving to Generation Z Do Top managers’ Psychological Attributes Influence Nonprofit Alliances for Resource Acquisition? An Application of Stimulus-Organization-Behavior-Consequence (S-O-B-C) Theory Using Social Media as a Marketing Communication Strategy: Perspectives from Health-Related Non-Profit Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1