Towards a resilient perspective for the future of offshore platforms. Insights from a data driven approach

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Transforming Government- People Process and Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI:10.1108/tg-04-2021-0067
F. Loia, Nunzia Capobianco, Roberto Vona
{"title":"Towards a resilient perspective for the future of offshore platforms. Insights from a data driven approach","authors":"F. Loia, Nunzia Capobianco, Roberto Vona","doi":"10.1108/tg-04-2021-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the collective perception regarding the future of offshore platforms and frame the main categories of meanings associated by the community with the investigated phenomenon.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA data driven approach has been conducted. The collection of the peoples’ opinions has been realized on two specific social network communities as follows: Twitter and Instagram. The text mining processes carried out a sentiment and a cluster analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe sentiment analysis of the most frequent words has been shown. The following four main homogeneous categories of words are emerged in relation to the decommissioning of offshore platforms: technological areas, green governance (GG), circular economy and socio-economic sphere.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe alternative use of the offshore platforms, including tourism initiatives, aquaculture, alternative energy generation, hydrogen storage and environmental research, could improve the resilience of communities by offering the development of new jobs and the growth of local and innovative green businesses.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe adoption of a circular model and GG initiatives aims to limit the input of resources and energy, minimize waste and losses, adopt a sustainable approach and realize new social and territorial value.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe analysis underlines the importance to adopt a systems perspective, which takes into account the social, economic and environmental system as a whole, the different phenomena that occur and the variety of categories of stakeholders, from users to local governments that participate in the territorial development.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-04-2021-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the collective perception regarding the future of offshore platforms and frame the main categories of meanings associated by the community with the investigated phenomenon. Design/methodology/approach A data driven approach has been conducted. The collection of the peoples’ opinions has been realized on two specific social network communities as follows: Twitter and Instagram. The text mining processes carried out a sentiment and a cluster analysis. Findings The sentiment analysis of the most frequent words has been shown. The following four main homogeneous categories of words are emerged in relation to the decommissioning of offshore platforms: technological areas, green governance (GG), circular economy and socio-economic sphere. Research limitations/implications The alternative use of the offshore platforms, including tourism initiatives, aquaculture, alternative energy generation, hydrogen storage and environmental research, could improve the resilience of communities by offering the development of new jobs and the growth of local and innovative green businesses. Practical implications The adoption of a circular model and GG initiatives aims to limit the input of resources and energy, minimize waste and losses, adopt a sustainable approach and realize new social and territorial value. Originality/value The analysis underlines the importance to adopt a systems perspective, which takes into account the social, economic and environmental system as a whole, the different phenomena that occur and the variety of categories of stakeholders, from users to local governments that participate in the territorial development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向未来海上平台的弹性前景。数据驱动方法的见解
本研究旨在调查关于海上平台未来的集体看法,并构建社区与所调查现象相关的主要意义类别。设计/方法/方法采用数据驱动的方法。人们的意见收集是在两个特定的社交网络社区上实现的:Twitter和Instagram。文本挖掘过程中进行了情感分析和聚类分析。研究结果对最常见的单词进行了情感分析。与海上平台退役相关的词汇主要有以下四个同质类别:技术领域、绿色治理(GG)、循环经济和社会经济领域。研究限制/影响海上平台的替代用途,包括旅游倡议、水产养殖、替代能源生产、储氢和环境研究,可以通过提供新的就业机会和当地创新绿色企业的增长,提高社区的复原力。实际意义采用循环模式和环保措施,旨在限制资源和能源的投入,减少浪费和损失,采用可持续发展的方法,实现新的社会和领土价值。独创性/价值该分析强调了采用系统视角的重要性,该视角考虑了整个社会、经济和环境系统,发生的不同现象以及参与领土开发的利益相关者的各种类别,从用户到地方政府。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Flawed charts in pension fund popular reports Public trust and collaborative e-governance performance: a study on government institutions and services Automation in public sector jobs and services: a framework to analyze public digital transformation’s impact in a data-constrained environment Digital inclusion for all? A gender-disaggregated analysis of e-government service use in Indonesia Measuring the effects of electronic government services and corrupt practices on information exchange: a comparison of public and private hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1