Shifting the Opioid Conversation from Stigma to Strengths: Opportunities for Developing Community-Academic Partnerships

R. Austin, C. Jones, Augustine Dominguez, Diana Hawkins, Carren Ondara, David Haynes, K. Monsen, Milton Eder
{"title":"Shifting the Opioid Conversation from Stigma to Strengths: Opportunities for Developing Community-Academic Partnerships","authors":"R. Austin, C. Jones, Augustine Dominguez, Diana Hawkins, Carren Ondara, David Haynes, K. Monsen, Milton Eder","doi":"10.24926/ijps.v9i1.4671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Opioid misuse and abuse is a longstanding concern, particularly in underserved communities. Community-level data is needed to understand how to best address the opioid crisis. A strengths-based whole-person approach can offset challenges in working to maximize individual health.\nObjectives: Project objectives included acquiring and providing data to the community to engage members in meaningful conversations about opioid misuse and abuse and gather insights to shape a response to the opioid crisis.\nMethods: University of Minnesota School of Nursing faculty collaborated with community partner Hue-MAN Partnership, to develop and implement a Community Opioid Survey at neighborhood meetings. The MyStrengths+MyHealth assessment was used to identify strengths of community members. Community meetings included introductions by the Hue-MAN Partnership, presentation of the survey data, and facilitated discussion to involve community members in data interpretation and solution development.\nResults: Data was collected at 11 community meetings between June 2018 and May 2019. Approximately half of respondents had been affected by opioid misuse or overdose; oxycodone was the most frequent opioid involved; community clinics were the most available resource; and community education was identified as a needed resource to reduce misuse and overdose. Communities perceived and used language differently in talking about opioids.\nConclusion: The community-academic- partnership enabled collection of community-specific data that may have been inaccessible to researchers working alone. Access to community-specific data holds promise for increasing research relevance and for engaging community knowledge and needs.","PeriodicalId":93186,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary journal of partnership studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary journal of partnership studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/ijps.v9i1.4671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Opioid misuse and abuse is a longstanding concern, particularly in underserved communities. Community-level data is needed to understand how to best address the opioid crisis. A strengths-based whole-person approach can offset challenges in working to maximize individual health. Objectives: Project objectives included acquiring and providing data to the community to engage members in meaningful conversations about opioid misuse and abuse and gather insights to shape a response to the opioid crisis. Methods: University of Minnesota School of Nursing faculty collaborated with community partner Hue-MAN Partnership, to develop and implement a Community Opioid Survey at neighborhood meetings. The MyStrengths+MyHealth assessment was used to identify strengths of community members. Community meetings included introductions by the Hue-MAN Partnership, presentation of the survey data, and facilitated discussion to involve community members in data interpretation and solution development. Results: Data was collected at 11 community meetings between June 2018 and May 2019. Approximately half of respondents had been affected by opioid misuse or overdose; oxycodone was the most frequent opioid involved; community clinics were the most available resource; and community education was identified as a needed resource to reduce misuse and overdose. Communities perceived and used language differently in talking about opioids. Conclusion: The community-academic- partnership enabled collection of community-specific data that may have been inaccessible to researchers working alone. Access to community-specific data holds promise for increasing research relevance and for engaging community knowledge and needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将阿片类对话从耻辱转向优势:发展社区学术伙伴关系的机会
背景:阿片类药物误用和滥用是一个长期存在的问题,特别是在服务不足的社区。需要社区层面的数据来了解如何最好地解决阿片类药物危机。以力量为基础的全人方法可以抵消在努力最大限度地提高个人健康方面的挑战。目标:项目目标包括获取和向社区提供数据,使成员参与关于阿片类药物滥用和滥用的有意义的对话,并收集见解,以形成对阿片类药物危机的反应。方法:明尼苏达大学护理学院教师与社区合作伙伴Hue-MAN Partnership合作,在社区会议上制定并实施社区阿片类药物调查。“我的优势+我的健康”评估被用来确定社区成员的优势。社区会议包括Hue-MAN伙伴关系的介绍,调查数据的介绍,以及促进社区成员参与数据解释和解决方案开发的讨论。结果:2018年6月至2019年5月期间,在11次社区会议上收集了数据。大约一半的答复者受到阿片类药物滥用或过量的影响;羟考酮是最常见的阿片类药物;社区诊所是最容易获得的资源;社区教育被认为是减少滥用和过量用药的必要资源。社区在谈论阿片类药物时感知和使用的语言不同。结论:社区-学术伙伴关系能够收集社区特定数据,这些数据可能是单独工作的研究人员无法获得的。获取社区特定数据有望提高研究的相关性,并吸引社区知识和需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
One Foundation’s Journey towards Centering Community-Led Work Artist's Statement: Blue Water Wings Implementation of a Curriculum to Optimize Hygiene Behaviors Among Refugees and Migrants Being Resettled Dear Healers: A Photographic Story of Finding Hope, Community, and Partnership in Connection with Nature Empowering Girls and Boys to be Leaders in Uganda: A Conversation with Dr. Mwalimu Musheshe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1