Dolores Frias-Navarro, Marcos Pascual-Soler, Eva Broseta-Aguilar, Hector Monterde-i-Bort, José Soriano-Pastor, Joana Fornés-Vives, María del Castillo Fuentes-Durán, F. García-Pérez, Laura Dolz-Serra, Ana D'Ocón-Gimenez
{"title":"Escala Breve de Ansiedad ante la Evaluación Académica (EBAEA-3)","authors":"Dolores Frias-Navarro, Marcos Pascual-Soler, Eva Broseta-Aguilar, Hector Monterde-i-Bort, José Soriano-Pastor, Joana Fornés-Vives, María del Castillo Fuentes-Durán, F. García-Pérez, Laura Dolz-Serra, Ana D'Ocón-Gimenez","doi":"10.18239/ensayos.v35i1.2291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolLos objetivos: analizar las propiedades psicometricas de una escala breve de ansiedad ante la evaluacion academica y comprobar si hay diferencias entre los alumnos que cursan una materia del area de metodologia o de otras areas. La muestra esta formada por 404 alumnos de Psicologia (M = 21.03 anos, DT = 5.45). El 56.4% reciben formacion en metodologia y el 43.6% en otras areas. Los resultados senalan que los estudiantes que reciben formacion en materias metodologicas informan de un mayor grado de ansiedad ante la evaluacion y perciben que tienen menor autoeficacia. Las implicaciones de los hallazgos estan vinculadas con la ensenanza de los contenidos de metodologia y alerta a los docentes sobre la necesidad de actuar para controlar esas percepciones EnglishThe objectives: to analyze the psychometric properties of a brief scale of pre-test anxiety and discover whether there are differences between students taking subjects in the area of methodology or in other areas. The sample is composed of 404 Psychology students (M = 21.03 years, SD = 5.45). Of them, 56.4% receive training in methodology and 43.6% in other areas. The results show that the students who receive training in methodological subjects report a greater degree of pre-test anxiety and perceive themselves as having less self-efficacy. The implications of the findings are linked to the teaching of the methodology contents, and they warn professors about the need to take steps to control these perceptions","PeriodicalId":42950,"journal":{"name":"Ensayos-Revista de la Facultad de Educacion de Albacete","volume":"35 1","pages":"175-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ensayos-Revista de la Facultad de Educacion de Albacete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18239/ensayos.v35i1.2291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolLos objetivos: analizar las propiedades psicometricas de una escala breve de ansiedad ante la evaluacion academica y comprobar si hay diferencias entre los alumnos que cursan una materia del area de metodologia o de otras areas. La muestra esta formada por 404 alumnos de Psicologia (M = 21.03 anos, DT = 5.45). El 56.4% reciben formacion en metodologia y el 43.6% en otras areas. Los resultados senalan que los estudiantes que reciben formacion en materias metodologicas informan de un mayor grado de ansiedad ante la evaluacion y perciben que tienen menor autoeficacia. Las implicaciones de los hallazgos estan vinculadas con la ensenanza de los contenidos de metodologia y alerta a los docentes sobre la necesidad de actuar para controlar esas percepciones EnglishThe objectives: to analyze the psychometric properties of a brief scale of pre-test anxiety and discover whether there are differences between students taking subjects in the area of methodology or in other areas. The sample is composed of 404 Psychology students (M = 21.03 years, SD = 5.45). Of them, 56.4% receive training in methodology and 43.6% in other areas. The results show that the students who receive training in methodological subjects report a greater degree of pre-test anxiety and perceive themselves as having less self-efficacy. The implications of the findings are linked to the teaching of the methodology contents, and they warn professors about the need to take steps to control these perceptions