Whither the Daang Matuwid?: Overconfidence in Benigno S. Aquino III’s Perception of Survival (2010–2016)

Q3 Social Sciences Philippine Political Science Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-22 DOI:10.1163/2165025x-bja10020
Eryan Ramadhani
{"title":"Whither the Daang Matuwid?: Overconfidence in Benigno S. Aquino III’s Perception of Survival (2010–2016)","authors":"Eryan Ramadhani","doi":"10.1163/2165025x-bja10020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe study of political decision-making cannot exclude the actors involved in the process. Neither can it disregard the interplay between decision-makers and political institution where they operate. This article aims to explain how perception of survival affects decision-making by focusing on leaders, specifically by analysing Benigno S. Aquino III’s leadership (2010–2016). Built on political psychology, I will show that motivation to maintain power may bias leaders’ reasoning leading to suboptimal decision. Accountability can help leaders mitigate bias, or de-bias, by stimulating their use of cognitive complexity. But the same effort may backfire and make leaders resort to heuristics instead. Where leaders end up in the cognitive spectrum depends on the types of audiences to whom they feel accountable: core (the ruling elites and loyal voters) and external (the opposition and its supporters) audiences. Preoccupation with core audiences can make leaders downplay the opposition challenge. Furthermore, leaders’ perceived understanding of their support base may be erroneous. The result is overconfidence in their perception of survival. I argue that President Aquino’s misperception of survival was rooted in his belief that (1) Filipinos would like to have his legacy continued and that (2) his popularity would help his successor Manuel Araneta Roxas II win the 2016 presidential race. This overconfidence turned out to be detrimental. Roxas’s electoral loss to Rodrigo Duterte put an end to the Daang Matuwid, President Aquino’s good governance platform.","PeriodicalId":53551,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Political Science Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Political Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2165025x-bja10020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of political decision-making cannot exclude the actors involved in the process. Neither can it disregard the interplay between decision-makers and political institution where they operate. This article aims to explain how perception of survival affects decision-making by focusing on leaders, specifically by analysing Benigno S. Aquino III’s leadership (2010–2016). Built on political psychology, I will show that motivation to maintain power may bias leaders’ reasoning leading to suboptimal decision. Accountability can help leaders mitigate bias, or de-bias, by stimulating their use of cognitive complexity. But the same effort may backfire and make leaders resort to heuristics instead. Where leaders end up in the cognitive spectrum depends on the types of audiences to whom they feel accountable: core (the ruling elites and loyal voters) and external (the opposition and its supporters) audiences. Preoccupation with core audiences can make leaders downplay the opposition challenge. Furthermore, leaders’ perceived understanding of their support base may be erroneous. The result is overconfidence in their perception of survival. I argue that President Aquino’s misperception of survival was rooted in his belief that (1) Filipinos would like to have his legacy continued and that (2) his popularity would help his successor Manuel Araneta Roxas II win the 2016 presidential race. This overconfidence turned out to be detrimental. Roxas’s electoral loss to Rodrigo Duterte put an end to the Daang Matuwid, President Aquino’s good governance platform.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹·玛图维德到哪里去了?:贝尼尼奥·s·阿基诺三世生存感知中的过度自信(2010-2016)
对政治决策的研究不能排除参与这一进程的行动者。它也不能忽视决策者和他们运作的政治机构之间的相互作用。本文旨在通过关注领导者,特别是通过分析贝尼尼奥·S·阿基诺三世(Benigno S.Aquino III)的领导力(2010-2016),来解释生存观如何影响决策。基于政治心理学,我将表明,保持权力的动机可能会使领导人的推理产生偏差,从而导致次优决策。问责可以通过刺激领导者使用认知复杂性来帮助他们减轻偏见或去偏见。但同样的努力可能会适得其反,使领导人转而采用启发式方法。领导人最终在认知光谱中的位置取决于他们认为对其负责的受众类型:核心受众(统治精英和忠诚选民)和外部受众(反对派及其支持者)。专注于核心受众可能会使领导人淡化反对派的挑战。此外,领导人对其支持基础的理解可能是错误的。结果是他们对生存的看法过于自信。我认为,阿基诺总统对生存的误解源于他的信念,即(1)菲律宾人希望他的遗产得到延续,(2)他的声望将帮助他的继任者曼努埃尔·阿拉内塔·罗克萨斯二世赢得2016年总统竞选。事实证明,这种过度自信是有害的。Roxas在选举中输给Rodrigo Duterte,结束了阿基诺总统的善政纲领Daang Matuwid。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philippine Political Science Journal
Philippine Political Science Journal Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Philippine Political Science Journal (PPSJ) is an internationally refereed journal and the official publication of the Philippine Political Science Association (PPSA). The PPSJ welcomes articles dealing with the politics and international relations of Southeast Asia. Manuscripts may focus on individual countries of the region but comparative articles about the countries in the region and the region as a whole are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Digital Innovations during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Facebook Use for Local E-Governance in the Province of South Cotabato Substantive Representation of Women in Asian Parliaments, edited by Devin K. Joshi and Christian Echle The Invention of China, written by Bill Hayton Politics versus Preparedness? How Electoral Incentives Affect the Provision of Local Disaster Public Goods in the Philippines Taiwan During the First Administration of Tsai Ing-Wen: Navigating in Stormy Waters, edited by Gunter Schubert and Chun-Yi Lee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1